THEME AND THEMATIC PROGRESSION OF UNDERGRADUATE THESES

Hamdan Zainu Mubarak

Abstract


This research aimed to analyze the theme and the thematic progression in undergraduate students’ theses. To achieve these aims, a qualitative research embracing case study was chosen. The participants of this research were six undergraduate students from academic year 2016, 2017, and 2018 in one of colleges in Garut. The data, students’ theses, were collected by techniques of document study based on theses theme (developing writing skill). The theory of theme by Butt et al (2000) and thematic progression by Bloor and Bloor (2004) was used to analyze the data. The result revealed that undergraduate students mostly used unmarked topical theme and reiteration pattern. It meant that the undergraduate students had tried to persuade the readers to accept their point of view and they had tried to make their text focus by repeating the same element as a theme.

Keywords


theme, thematic progression, undergraduate thesis, background of the study.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amri, W (2016). Teacher’s Oral Corrective Feedback Strategy in English

Language Classroom. UIN Aceh Thesis

Brookhart, Susan M. How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. New York: ASCB.

(2008).

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th

Edition). London: Routledge Falmer. In: Sharma (2010).

Cullen, R. 2002. Supportive Teacher Talk: The Importance of the F- Move. ELT Journal,

(2), 117-

Ellis, R. Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1, (2009): 3-

Creswell, Jhon W. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method

Approaches. New York: Cambridge University. (2009).

Fraenkel, Jack R. And Norman E. Wallen. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research

in English Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal 17

Vol. 4 No.1, 2021

Education. New York. McGrawHill Companies.

Gay, L. R and Airasian p. Educational Research Competences for Analysis and

Application. New Jersey: Prentice hall Inc. (2000).

Gebhard, J. G. 2000. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second

Language: A Teacher SelfDevelopment and Methodology Guide. Ann Arbor: The

University of Michigan Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson

Education.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational

Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487

Irawan, E. & Salija, K. (2017). Teachers’ Oral Feedback in EFL Classroom Interaction (A

Descriptive Study of Senior High School in Indonesia). State University of

Makassar, Indonesia. doi: 10.26858/eltww.v4i2.4496 Kumaravadivelu, B.

(2014). Afterword: Rethinking global perspectives and local initiatives in language

teaching. In S. Ben Said (Ed.), Language teachers and teaching: Global

perspectives, local initiatives (pp. 317e323). New York, NY: Routledge

Lyster, R.; Ranta, L. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in

communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,

Cambridge, v. 19, n. 1, p. 37-66, 1997.

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2012). Oral corrective feedback in second language

classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(01), 1–40. doi:

1017/s0261444812000365 Mackiewicz, J. & Thompson, I. 2013. Motivational

Scaffolding, Politeness, and Writing Center Tutoring. The Writing Center

Journal, 33(1), 38-73.

Maizola (2016). Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback on Students’ Dialogue Performance

at Senior High School. STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat Thesis

Ningkrum (2018). Analysis of Oral Corrective Feedback On

Students’ Speaking Performance In Efl Classes. UNNES paper

Norris, J. M. and L. Ortega (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis

and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3), 417-528.

Brookhart, Susan M. How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students. New York: ASCB.

(2008). Brookhart, Susan M. How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students.

New York: ASCB. (2008). Education, 2009.

Rahimi, M. & Sobhani, A. Teachers‟ Different Types of Feedback on Iranian EFL

learners‟ Speaking Errors and Their Impact on the Students‟ Uptake of The

Correct Forms. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning. Holonic

Open University: ISSN. (2015).

Russel, J.; Spada, N. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2

grammar: a meta-analysis research.

Rydahl, S. (2005). Oral Feedbackin the English Classroom: Teachers’ Thoughtsand

Awareness. English Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal 18

Vol. 4 No.1, 2021

Karlstad: Karlstads Universitet. Retrieved February 3, 2016 from

.

Sa’adah, Nurkamto, and Suparno (2018). Oral Corrective Feedback: Exploring

the Relationship between Teacher’s Strategy and Students’

Willingness to Communicate. 5(2), 240-252. doi:

24815/siele.v5i2.11532

Sepehrinia, S., & Mehdizadeh, M. (2016). Oral corrective feedback: teachers’

concerns and researchers’ orientation. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4),

–500. doi:10.1080/09571736.201 6.1172328

Shaofeng Li (2014). Oral Corrective Feedback. ELT Journal Volume 68/2;

doi:10.1093/elt/cct076

Sheen, Y. & R. Ellis. Corrective Feedback in Language Teaching.

In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language

Teaching and Learning, Vol.2. New York: Routledge, (2011): 593-610.

Siska, Mukhaiyar, and Ratmanida (2018). English Teachers’ Strategies in Giving Oral

Corrective Feedback on Students’ Speaking Performance. Proceedings of the

Sixth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-6)

Sprouls, K. Teachers‟ Use of Positive and Negative Feedback with the Students Who Are

High-Risk for Emotional Behavioral Disorders. A Dissertation Presented

in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree

Doctor of Philosophy. Arizona State University. (2011): 33.

Syara (2019). An Analysis Of Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback in English Classroom

Interaction

At The Seventh Grade School. IAIN

Surakarta Thesis

Taipale, P. (2012). Oral errors, corrective feedback, and learners’ uptake in an EFL

setting (Master Thesis, University of Jyväskylä).

Retrieved from:

https://jyx.jyu.fi/space/bitstream/ handle/123456789/37544/URN_ NBN_fi_jyu201203121409.pdf; sequence=4.

Tunstall, P. & Gipps, C. 1996. Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative

Assessment: A Typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4),

-404.

Tsui, A. B. M. (1995). Introducing Classroom Interaction. London: Penguin. In:

Kimoga, J. (2014)

Wannemacker, Stefan De et al. Interdisciplinary Approach to

Adapting Learning. London: Springer.Verlag Berlin

Durdrecht. (2011). English Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal 19

Vol. 4 No.1, 2021

Winne, P. H. & Butler, D. L. (1994). Student Cognition in learning from teaching. In T.

Husen & T.

Postlewaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp.5738-

. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Yoshida, R. Learners in Japanese Language




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal%20journal.v4i1.1102

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal%20journal.v4i1.1102.g767

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 EEAL Journal (English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

English Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal is a scientific journal regularly published by Department of English Education, Institut Pendidikan Indonesia (Jl. Pahlawan No.32, Garut,Indonesia). EEAL Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © Institut Pendidikan Indonesia-Garut.

View EEAL stats