Deriantami Riksadianti


This research was carried out to find the significant effect of Frayer Model in enhancing students’ vocabulary. The research was taken place in one of private Vocational High School in Garut and it was participated by second grade students. The research employed quantitative methodology by using quasi experimental design. The instrument of the research was test; pretest and post-test. The purposive sampling was used. There were 42 students who participated in the study that was consisted of two groups; experimental with 22 students and control group with 20 students. Prior treatment, a pretest was administered to find out the overview of students’ vocabulary. During the treatment, participants in experimental group were exposed to use Frayer model and in control group they used conventional method; translating word using dictionary and illustration.The researcher found that high school students have problem in mastering and remembering the English After the treatment, post-test was administered to see the improvement gained by the participant. The data obtained from pretest and post-test were analyzed by statistical analysis; SPSS 16.00 and manual calculation. Then, the data were analyzed by using parametric test, t test. The result of the research showed the improvement of experimental group’s post-test mean score that was 80. It was bigger than their pretest mean score that was 42.82. It is also supported by the mean gain score of experimental group that got 0.54. Therefore, there was significant effect on students’ vocabulary by using Frayer Model.


Vocabulary, Frayer Model

Full Text:



Ansarin, A. A., Zohrabi, M., Zeynali, S. (2012). Language learning strategies and vocabulary

size of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 2(9), pp 1841-1848.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., C., Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education

(8th Edition). USA: Wadsworth.

Aydogan, H., Akbarov, A. A. (2014). The four basic language skills and integrated skills

approach in main stream university classrooms in Turkey. Mediterranian Journal of Social

Sciences, 5(9), pp 672-686.

Brewster, J., Ellis, G., Girard, D. (2002). The English Teacher’s Guide. New York: Longman.

Bojovic, Milevica. (2010). Reading kill and reading comprehension in English for specific

purposes. The International Language Conference of Learning Professional Foreign Languages

between Cul tures. Celje, Slovenia.

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University


Cohen,L,. Manion, L., Morrisonz, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6thEdition). New

York: Routledge

Conderman, G., Hedin, L., Bresnahan, V. (2013). Strategy Instruction for Middle and Secondary

Students with Mild Disabilities. California: Corwin SAGE Company.

Coxhead, A. (2012). Researching vocabulary in secondary school English texts. English

in Aotearoa, 1(9), pp 34-41.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods

Approaches (3rd edition). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research; Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Qualitative,

Quantitative Research (4th edition). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

E., E., Nahampun. (2014). The effect of using Frayer Model on students’ vocabulary mastery.

Journal of Applied Linguistics. 1(3).

Estacio, D.R & Matinez, O. D. (2017). The use of modified frayer model in developing science

vocabulary of senior high school students. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities

and Social Sciences. 4(1), pp 36-42.

Fraenkel, J., R., Wallen, N., E., Hyun, H., H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in

Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Frayer, D., W. C. Frederick, and H. J. Klausmeier. (2001). A schema for testing the level of

cognitive mastery. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Centre for Education Research.

GlobalWarming.(28th March 2019).

Retrieved from https://www.nationalgraphic.org/nqencyclopdia/ global-warming/ on 3th July

Gore, M., C. (2010) Inclusion Strategies for Secondary Classrooms: Keys for Struggling Learners.

California: Corwin a SAGE Company.

Harris, T., L., Hodges, R., E. (2009). The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and

Writing. New York: Longman.

Hatch, E., Brown, C. (2001). Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education. New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Hiebert E.H. & Kamil M.L. (2005). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary: Bringing Research to

practice. Lawrence: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Hornby, A., S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners of Current English. New York: Oxford

University Press.English Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal 56

Vol. 4 No.1, Feb 2021

Hood, S., Solomon, N., Burns, A. (2002). Focus on Reading. Sydney: NCELTR

Ilter, Ilham (2015). The Investigation of the Effect of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in

Social Studies. Elementary Education. 14(3), pp 1108-1129.

Kartalmis, I., Orsel, C., and Yavuz, F. (2017). An Analysis of Vocabulary Teaching Strategies for

Turkish Young Learners. Eurasian Conference on Language and Social Science.5(6).

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Bahasa Inggris

SMA/MA/SMK/MAK kelas XI. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Krashen, S. (2003). Reading and vocabulary acquisition: supporting evidence and some objections.

Irani an Journal of Language Testing and Research, 1(1).

Laufer, B. (2003). The development of passive and active vocabulary in second language: same or

different?. Applied linguistics, 19(22), pp 33-51.

Lessard-Clouston, M. (2013). Teaching Vocabulary. Virginia: TESOL International Associantion

Lopez, K. K., Cummins, C. (2009). Read: Seventy Strategies to Support Reading Success. Jhon

Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Macceca, S. (2014) Reading Strategies for Social Studies (2nd edition). California: Shell

Education Publishing Inc.

Mckee, S. (2012). Reading Comprehension, What we know: A review of research 1995 to 2011.

Language Testing in Asia.

Mofareh, Alqahtani. (2015). The im portance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be

taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education. 3(3), pp. 21-34.

Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A Review on the Important Role of

Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension Performance. Vol.(66), pp 555-563.

Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd edition). Boston:

Heinle & Heinle.

Nan, Chengyu (2018). Implication of interrelationship among four language skills for high school

english teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 9(2), pp 418-423.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge:Cambridge

University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2006). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (1

st edition). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I, S, P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd edition). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I, S, P. (2015). Principle guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Journal

Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), pp 136-145.

Neuman, S, B., Dwiyer, J. (2009). Missing in action vocabulary instruction in pre-k. Reading

Teacher Journal, 62 pp 384-392.

Qourora, A., A. (2018). The impact of Frayer Model and contextual redefinition strategy on

improving preparatory stage pupils’ Vocabu lary Learning. Journal of Research Curriculum,

Instruction and Educational Technology. 4(4), pp 11-36.

Read, J. (2000) Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reed, K. D., Jemison, E., Sidler-Folsom, J., Weber, A. (2018). Electronic graphic organizers for

learning science vocabulary and concepts: the effects of online synchronous discussion. The

Journal of Experimental Education,

Richards, J. C. (2003). Teaching listening and speaking. New York: Cambridge

Schunk, D.H., Patrich, P.R and Meece, J., L. (2010). Motivation in education (3rd edition). London:

Pearson Educational LTDEnglish Education and Applied Linguistics (EEAL) Journal 57

Vol. 4 No.1, Feb 2021

Sharifian, Farzad (2009). English as International Language. Britain: MPG Books, Ltd.

Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary Knowledge and Advanced Listening Comprehension in English

as a Foreign Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577-607.

Sullivan, M. T. (2014). Using adapted Frayer model as graphic organizer for graph vocabulary.

In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT

Sundayana,R.(2015).Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: ALFABETA

Teng, F. (2016). An in-depth invetigation into relationship between vocabulary knowledge and

academic listening comprehension. Journal Teaching English as Second Language, 20(2), 1-17.

The Biology Teacher’s Handbook 4th edition. (2009). United States:National Science Teacher


Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. London: Longman.

Thayn, K, S. (2010). An Evaluation of Multiple Choice Test Question Deliberately Designed to

Include Multiple Correct Answer. New York: Routledge

Wanjiru, B., O-Connor, M. (2015). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction on students’

achievement in mathematics in secondary schools of Murang’a County Kenya. Journal of

Education and Practice. 6(18), pp 201-207.

Wessels, S. (2011). Promoting vocabulary learning for english learners. Reading Teacher, 65(1),


Yip, Jeffrey. (2009). Return on Experience; Learning Leadership at Work. North Carolina: Center

for Creative Leadership

Zeeland, H., V. (2013). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. United Kingdom: Blackwell

Publishing Ltd.

Zhou, Songbo. (2010). Comparing Receptive and Productive Academic Vocabulary Knowledge of

Chinese EFL Learners. Asian Social Science 6(10), pp 14-19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal%20journal.v4i1.1106

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal%20journal.v4i1.1106.g771


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 EEAL Journal (English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License   
e-issn 2622-1675 p-issn 2621-9131