An Analysis of Essay Writing Errors among English-Major Freshmen at Thu Dau Mot University

Authors

  • Thanh Thai Nguyen Thu Dau Mot University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/w6w9ct49

Keywords:

essay writing errors, error analysis, EFL writing, English-majored freshmen, Thu Dau Mot University

Abstract

This study investigates the common essay writing errors made by English-majored freshmen at Thu Dau Mot University. The study aims to identify the major types of errors in students’ essays and examine the possible sources of those errors. Adopting a descriptive corpus-based error analysis design, the study analyzed 60 English essays written by first-year English-majored students. The essays were collected through a controlled writing task and examined using Corder’s (1967) framework of error analysis. The identified errors were classified into thirteen categories and analyzed quantitatively in terms of frequency and percentage, with qualitative interpretation used to explain possible causes. The findings revealed a total of 1,530 errors, with an average of 25.5 errors per essay. The most frequent error types were word form (23.99%), word choice (21.31%), and spelling (8.43%), followed by organization, verb tense, punctuation, and missing words. The findings suggest that students’ writing difficulties stem mainly from limited vocabulary, insufficient grammatical knowledge, intralingual overgeneralization, and mother tongue interference. The study highlights that freshmen’s essay writing problems are not limited to sentence-level grammar, but also extend to text organization and coherence. It is therefore recommended that writing instruction should address both linguistic accuracy and essay development skills in order to improve students’ writing performance more effectively.

References

Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Allen, H. B., & Russel, N. B. (1965). Teaching English as a second language. USA: McGraw Hill.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Byrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills. Longman handbooks for language teachers. Longman: London.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161

Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.

Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Dinh, T. T. T. (2008). Аn аnаlуsis оf thе еrrоrs mаdе sеcоnd-уеаr studеnts аt Hаnоi Univеrsitу оf Businеss аnd Tеchnоlоgу in thеir writing рареr. MА Thеsis

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.

https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Flower, L.S. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English.

Hubbard, P., Jones, H., Thornton, B., & Wheeler, R. (1984). A training course for TEFL. Oxford University Press.

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842912

Nguyen, N. T. (2010). Аn invеstigаtiоn оf cоmmоn writtеn еrrоrs in Еnglish cоmроsitiоns mаdе bу Viеtnаmеsе studеnts аt thе nаtiоnаl Cоllеgе оf Еducаtiоn–HCM Citу undеr thе influеncе оf nаtivе lаnguаgе trаnsfеr. Unрublishеd M.А Thеsis. HCM: Hо Chi Minh Ореn Univеrsitу.

Pham, V. T. (2010). Writing Еrrоrs Mаdе bу Third Уеаr Еnglish Mаjоrs in Dоng Thар Univеrsitу. Unрublishеd M.А Thеsis. Hа Nоi: Hа Nоi Univеrsitу.

Pierpont, J. (2004). ЕSL studеnts in first-уеаr writing sеminаrs: hеlрing instructоrs tо аddrеss thеir lаnguаgе nееds. Nеw Уоrk: Cоrnеll Univеrsitу.

Richards, J. C. (1974). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. Longman.

Richards, J. C. (1984) Еrrоr Аnаlуsis: Реrsреctivеs оn Sеcоnd Lаnguаgе Аcquisitiоn. Lоndоn: Lоngmаn

Richards, J. C., & Sampson, G. P. (1974). The study of learner English. In J. C. Richards (ed.) Error Analysis. Perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 3-18.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2011). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835

Schеctеr, S., Swаn, M., & Smith, B. (1988). Lеаrnеr Еnglish: А Tеаchеr's Guidе tо Intеrfеrеncе аnd Оthеr Рrоblеms. Thе Mоdеrn Lаnguаgе Jоurnаl, 72(4), 461.

Selinker, L. (1974). Intеrlаnguаgе. In Sеlinkеr, J. (Еd.). Еrrоr аnаlуsis: Реrsреctivеs оn Sеcоnd Lаnguаgе Аcquisitiоn. 31-54. Еssех: Lоngmаn.

Teh, G. C. (1993). Error analysis and correction of written work in the classroom. The English Teacher, 22, 1-15.

Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-11

How to Cite

An Analysis of Essay Writing Errors among English-Major Freshmen at Thu Dau Mot University. (2026). English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal), 9(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.31980/w6w9ct49