Profilling model of students' mathematics learning performance using fuzzy inference system based on assessment results and adversity quotient

Authors

  • Vanessa Zahwa Chakim Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Rina Marlina Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Latifah Darojat Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/d2maym55

Keywords:

Adversity Quotient, Fuzzy Inference System, Mathematics Assesment, Profilling Model

Abstract

This study develops a learning performance profiling model for mathematics students using the Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) by integrating assessment results and Adversity Quotient (AQ). The study employs a quantitative approach with computational modeling design. Input variables consist of academic assessment scores (range 0–100) and AQ scores measured through the CORE dimensions (Control, Ownership, Reach, Endurance), while the output variable is the student learning performance profile categorized as Low, Sufficient, Good, and Very Good. Data were obtained from 31 students of SMAN 2 Telukjambe Timur. The FIS model was built through fuzzification, fuzzy inference using MIN-MAX operators, and centroid defuzzification, implemented using Python Scikit-Fuzzy. Results show that 83.9% of students are profiled as Good, 9.7% as Sufficient, 6.5% as Very Good, and 0% as Low. The model demonstrates that AQ contributes significantly to differentiated profiling: two students with identical assessment scores of 100 but differing AQ values (80 vs. 130) produced a 20.31-point gap in output values (Z* = 60.67 vs. Z* = 80.98). The model successfully captures continuous performance gradations that conventional single-score assessments cannot detect, providing more comprehensive, transparent, and pedagogically meaningful diagnostic information for learning intervention planning.

References

Agustiani, S., & Marlena, L. (2023). Rasch Model: Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Sma Negeri Di Kota Bogor Berdasarkan Kategori Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i4.18615

Ahmad, S., & Dewi, N. (2024). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri dan Adversity Quotient terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. JUDIKDAS: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 3(3), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v3i3.1239

Diouane, H., Binaoui, A., & Moubtassime, M. (2025). Optimizing Heritage Design Education in Morocco Using English and AI. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 17(4), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2025.04.04

Goyal, M., Gupta, C., & Gupta, V. (2022). A meta-analysis approach to measure the impact of project-based learning outcome with program attainment on student learning using fuzzy inference systems. Heliyon, 8.

Hayati, N., Anggoro, B. S., & Imama, K. (2022). The effect of integrating society, science, environment, technology, and collaborative mind mapping (ISSETCM2) model on mathematical literacy in terms of adversity quotient. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i2.118

Khusna, F., Sari, W. K., & Nada, E. I. (2023). The Correlation Between Adversity Quotient and Critical Thinking Ability of Chemistry Education Students. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 5(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2023.5.1.16146

Lestari, I. D., & Juandi, D. (2023). Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Reviewed From Adversity Quotient: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v13i1.73997

Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2

Nurmamatovna, I. S., o'g'li, E. S. T., o'g'li, R. S. M., Nurmamatovna, I. F., Baxtiyorovna, M. S., & oʻgʻli, N. J. T. (2026). Request-Aware Fuzzy Load Balancing for Heterogeneous Computing Systems. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 09(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V9-i5-53

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Ogorodova, A., Shamoi, P., & Karatayev, A. (2025). Fuzzy Intelligent System for Student Software Project Evaluation. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 17(4), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2025.04.02

Pathak, B. K. (2025). Assessing Student Academic Performance with Fuzzy Expert System. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 17(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2025.02.05

Rahayu, S., & Vizha, A. (2024). Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability of Middle School Students Based on Adversity Quotient in Algebra Material. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v12i2.64809

Rosli Razak, T., Zia Ul-Saufie, A., Yusoff, M. H., Hafiz Ismail, M., Mohd Fauzi, S. S., & Mohd Zaki, N. A. (2024). Python scikit-fuzzy: developing a fuzzy expert system for diabetes diagnosis. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 13(2), 1398. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1398-1407

Rustan, E., Ihsan, M., & Nurlindasari, N. (2022). Adversity Quotient and Learning Interests To Mathematics Learning Achievement. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.5262

Saatchi, R. (2024). Fuzzy Logic Concepts, Developments and Implementation. Information, 15(10), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100656

Safi'i, A., Muttaqin, I., Sukino, Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa'i, Muh. K. (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12), e08510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510

Samavat, T., Nazari, M., Ghalehnoie, M., Nasab, M. A., Zand, M., Sanjeevikumar, P., & Khan, B. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of the Mamdani and Sugeno Fuzzy Inference Systems for MPPT of an Islanded PV System. International Journal of Energy Research, 2023, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7676113

Sapuguh, I., Ahlina, N., Wahyudi, A., Setyawan, B., Rosalinda, A. S., & Informatika, T. (2024). Development of fuzzy logic based student performance prediction system. Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T Medicom, 284–290.

Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities.

Thanh Loan, D. T., Duy Tho, N., Huu Nghia, N., Chien, V. D., & Anh Tuan, T. (2024). Analyzing Students' Performance Using Fuzzy Logic and Hierarchical Linear Regression. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2024.01.01

Tuan, T. A., Tho, N. D., Nghia, N. H., & Loan, T. T. (2025). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fuzzy Logic for Students' Performance Assessment. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 73(9). https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I9P114

Zulpah, M., Nesa, Z., Mulyanti, Y., Setiani, A., & Sukabumi, U. M. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Ana Setiani, 3(2).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Profilling model of students’ mathematics learning performance using fuzzy inference system based on assessment results and adversity quotient. (2025). Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 4(3), 598-617. https://doi.org/10.31980/d2maym55