Students' learning obstacles in solving equivalent ratio problems: a developmental perspective on proportional reasoning

Authors

  • Amelia Hayatul Fardah Universitas Siliwangi
  • Dedi Muhtadi Universitas Siliwangi
  • Sukirwan Sukirwan Universitas Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/2q9grs61

Keywords:

kesulitan belajar, rasio ekuivalen, perbandingan senilai, learning difficulties, equivalent ratios, ability

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ learning difficulties in equivalent ratio problems from the perspectives of conceptual and procedural understanding, as well as to identify the factors contributing to these difficulties. The study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive research design. Data were collected through diagnostic tests and in-depth interviews involving seventh-grade students at a junior high school in Tasikmalaya City. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed that students continued to experience both conceptual and procedural difficulties in solving equivalent ratio problems. Conceptual difficulties were indicated by students’ inability to understand proportional relationships and their tendency to employ additive reasoning in situations requiring multiplicative reasoning. Meanwhile, procedural difficulties involved errors in determining scale factors, the use of inappropriate solution procedures, and unsystematic problem-solving steps. These difficulties were influenced by weak conceptual understanding and learning practices that remained predominantly procedure-oriented. The findings highlight the importance of implementing equivalent ratio instruction that is more conceptual, contextual, and oriented toward developing students’ Proportional reasoning. 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah rasio ekuivalen berdasarkan pemahaman konseptual dan prosedural serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penyebabnya. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes diagnostik dan wawancara mendalam terhadap siswa kelas VII di salah satu SMP di Kota Tasikmalaya, kemudian dianalisis melalui reduksi, penyajian, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa masih mengalami kesulitan konseptual dan prosedural. Kesulitan konseptual ditandai oleh ketidakmampuan memahami hubungan proporsional serta kecenderungan menggunakan additive reasoning pada situasi yang memerlukan multiplicative reasoning. Kesulitan prosedural meliputi kesalahan menentukan faktor pengali, penggunaan prosedur yang tidak tepat, dan penyelesaian yang tidak sistematis. Kesulitan tersebut dipengaruhi oleh lemahnya pemahaman konsep dan pembelajaran yang berorientasi pada prosedur. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya pembelajaran rasio ekuivalen yang lebih konseptual, kontekstual, dan berorientasi pada pengembangan proportional reasoning siswa.

References

Adu-Gyamfi, K., Chandler, K., & Thompson, A. (2025). Algebra story problem: The nature of students’ obstacles. School Science and Mathematics, 125(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12659

Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Peran RME terhadap Miskonsepsi Siswa MTs pada Materi Bangun Datar Segi Empat. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 359-368.

Afriansyah, E. A., & Arwadi, F. (2021). Learning Trajectory of Quadrilateral Applying Realistic Mathematics Education: Origami-Based Tasks. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(4), 42-78.

Afriansyah, E. A., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). Design Research in Fraction for Prospective Teachers. In Proceedings of the 5th SEA-DR (South East Asia Development Research) International Conference.

Al-Qonuni, S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2023). Miskonsepsi siswa smp pada materi perbandingan dengan menggunakan four tier diagnostic test. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(2), 205-214.

Aladwan, S. Q. A., Alfayez, M. Q. E., & Shaheen, H. R. A. (2023). The Level of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics and Its Relationship to Creative Thinking among Gifted Students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1648a

Alamiah, U. S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Perbandingan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa antara yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education dan Open-Ended. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 207-216.

Amador, J. M., Glassmeyer, D., & Brakoniecki, A. (2025). Teachers’ noticing of proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 28(4), 879–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09625-7

Ambarwati, D., & Masduki. (2024). An exploration into the ability of fifth-grade students to solve decimal problems using proportional reasoning. 38(2), 180–194.

Annisa, D. P., Kadarisma, G., & Afrilianto, M. (2025). Literature Review: The Effectiveness of The Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Students Mathematical Communication Skills. (Jiml) Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 8(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v8i1.23237

Cabuquin, J., & Abocejo, F. (2024). Conceptual and Procedural Understanding in the Division of Algebraic Fractions. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(1), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2412.01.17

Fathiyah, I., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2024). Middle School Students’ Proportional Reasoning Ability in Solving Proportional and Non-proportional Problem. Prisma, 13(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i1.3841

González-Forte, J. M., Fernández, C., Van Hoof, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2023). Incorrect Ways of Thinking About the Size of Fractions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(7), 2005–2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10338-7

Hernandez-Martinez, P., Rogovchenko, S., Rogovchenko, Y., & Treffert-Thomas, S. (2024). “The theorem says…”: Engineering students making meaning of solutions to Ordinary Differential Equations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73(November 2022), 101116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101116

Hussein, Y. F. (2022). Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences. Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 50–65. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.47631/mejress.v3i1.445

Khasawneh, A. A., Al-Barakat, A. A., & Almahmoud, S. A. (2022). The Effect of Error Analysis-Based Learning on Proportional Reasoning Ability of Seventh-Grade Students. Frontiers in Education, 7(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.899288

Lanani, K., Nur, I. M., & Sari, D. P. (2024). Proportional Thinking Characteristics of Students In Solving Direct Proportion Problems in Junior High School. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 9(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v9i1.18386

Linuhung, N., Purwanto, Sukoriyanto, & Sudirman. (2024). Exploring students’ proportional reasoning in mathematical literacy problem solving: recognition of multiplicative relationship strategies. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 67(1), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.1.13

Manurung, M. L., Harahap, N. P., Nasution, M. F., Sipayung, M. K., & Naibaho, M. C. A. (2023). Peran Komunikasi Dan Kolaborasi Matematika Dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad 21. JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin, 1(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.59945/jpnm.v1i4.54

Maudy, S. Y., & Ruli, R. M. (2024). Learning obstacle instrument analysis of proportion concept with praxiology framework. Journal of Didactic Mathematics, 5(3), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v5i3.2435

Mulia, T. C., & Rahayu, W. (2023). Creative Thinking in Mathematics. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v7i2.8528

Munawwaroh, A. G., Pramudya, I., & Nurhasanah, F. (2025). Epistemological Obstacles in the Process of Learning Mathematical Abstraction: A Systematic Literature Review. KnE Social Sciences, 10(11), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i11.18749

Muryani, D. I., Jana, P., & Umasugi, S. M. (2022). The Students’ Misconceptions in Using Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test on the Angle Relationships. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 12(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i1.9641

Novita, R., Putra, M., Usman, & Junita, S. (2025). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in students’ fraction division thinking: Insights from a hermeneutic phenomenological study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(4), 1233–1256. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i4.pp1233-1256

Nurkamilah, P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Bilangan Berpangkat. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 49-60.

Parameswari, P., Fitria, A., & Labuem, S. (2025). When proportion problems confuse : prospective teacher students ’ reasoning difficulties. 10(2), 215–225.

Ruli, R. M., Juandi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Maudy, S. Y. (2025). From Arithmetic to Algebra: Students’ Epistemological Obstacles. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 9(2), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v9i2.205

Sadiah, D. S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2023). Miskonsepsi siswa ditinjau dari tingkat penyelesaian masalah pada materi operasi pecahan. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 31-44.

Saepulrohman, I., & Maryati, I. (2025). Improving mathematical critical thinking skills through problem-based learning in correlation analysis for high school students. PLUSMINUS : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032102

Santana-Ramírez, H. F., Salgado-Beltrán, G., García-García, J., & López-González, A. (2025). Alternative conceptions about proportional reasoning in high school students. Infinity Journal, 14(3), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i3.p781-796

Sari, F. Y., Ilma, R., Putri, I., & Susanti, E. (2025). Systematic Literature Review : Exploring Research Focus on Ratio and Proportion One of the fundamental topics in mathematics learning is ratio and proportion. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 156–166.

Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025). Ratios in Agriculture: A Rice Fertilization Context for Ratio Learning Trajectory. Mathematics Education Journal, 19(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v19i3.pp509-526

Schadl, C., & Ufer, S. (2023). Beyond linearity: Using IRT-scaled level models to describe the relation between prior proportional reasoning skills and fraction learning outcomes. Child Development, 94(6), 1642–1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13954

Schulz, A. (2024). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7

Selpiana, S., & Mulbar, U. (2025). Literature Review: Misconceptions of 7th Grade Students on the Concepts of Direct and Inverse Proportion. OMEGA: Jurnal Keilmuan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(3), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.47662/jkpm.v4i3.1084

Spitzer, M. W. H., Ruiz-Garcia, M., & Moeller, K. (2025). Basic mathematical skills and fraction understanding predict percentage understanding: Evidence from an intelligent tutoring system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(3), 1122–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13517

Sugiarni, R., & Abdullah, K. H. (2024). Publication trends on proportional reasoning research: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. International Journal of Didactic Mathematics in Distance Education, 1(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijdmde.v1i2.9474

Sugiarni, R., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Maskar, S. (2025). Digital Didactical Design Alternatif Based on Learning Obstacles in Topic of Proportion: A Study of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. Acta Scientiae, 27(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.8155

Sumpter, L., Blomqvist, A., Nydahl, A., & Sollerman, S. (2025). Mathematical equivalence and grade 6 students’ errors. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 3831, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2550274

Tularam, G. A., & Hassan, O. M. (2025). Persistent Misconceptions in Algebra: A Critical Analysis of Errors with Implications for Teaching and Further Research. Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2025.38.50

Wardani, A. K., Prabawanto, S., & Jupri, A. (2024). How Students’ Obstacle in Solving Ratio and Proportion Problem? Focusing on Mathematical Literacy Proces. Mosharafah Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i2.1933

Warli, D., Fatimah, S., Wicaksono, A., Kahar, M. J., Fajriani, F., & Deeteng, A. (2025). Exploration of student learning obstacles in solving propotional problems in junior high school. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i1.26478

Watanabe, T. (2024). Ratio, rate, and proportion in Japanese curriculum materials. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 3(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263241281381

Zorrilla, C., Roos, A. K., Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Prediger, S. (2024). Connecting operation-choice problems by the variation principle: Sixth graders’ operational or deeper relational pathways. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73(November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101104

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Students’ learning obstacles in solving equivalent ratio problems: a developmental perspective on proportional reasoning. (2025). Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 4(3), 794-816. https://doi.org/10.31980/2q9grs61