Physics teachers’ difficulties in teaching introduction to quantum physics in senior high school
Abstract
The High School Physics curriculum would not be complete without some basic concepts of Quantum Physics. The basic concepts of Quantum Physics are attractive to students, but the material is challenging to teach. This is because the phenomenon of Quantum Physics experienced by students is different from the real world and many principles of Quantum Physics may not be in accordance with the ideas that students know. Although the results of previous studies revealed a lot of research on the context of students' understanding of the concepts of Quantum Physics. However, limited empirical data regarding the difficulties of high school teachers in teaching quantum physics are still rarely encountered in physics education research. This study aims to explore data on the difficulties of high school physics teachers in teaching quantum physics concepts. This research design uses quantitative and qualitative case study methods. To get three participants, namely 3 twelfth grade high school physics teachers, the researcher used a purposive sampling technique. The age range of participants is between 45-55 years while the teaching experience of teachers ranges from 10 to 30 years. The instruments used in this study were a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview protocol. In this study, the questionnaire analysis used descriptive statistical analysis, while the interview data analysis used thematic analysis. The results of the study revealed that high school physics teachers had difficulty understanding the concept of quantum physics, and had little difficulty in determining the right pedagogical approach, conducting laboratory activities, and building an evaluation system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adbo, Karina, and Keith S Taber. 2009. Learners’ mental models of the particle nature of matter: a study of 16-year-old swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education 31 (6): 757–786.
Akarsu, Bayram. 2010. An extensive study of teaching/learning quantum mechanics in college. arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.4975.
Bøe, Maria Vetleseter, Ellen Karoline Henriksen, and Carl Angell. 2018. Actual versus implied physics students: how students from traditional physics classrooms related to an innovative approach to quantum physics. Science Education 102 (4): 649–667.
Bouchée, Tim, M Thurlings, L de Putter-Smits, and Birgit Pepin. 2021. Investigating teachers’ and students’ experiences of quantum physics lessons: opportunities and challenges. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–23.
Braun, Virginia, Victoria Clarke, and Nikki Hayfield. 2022. ‘a starting point for your journey, not a map’: nikki hayfield in conversation with virginia braun and victoria clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology 19 (2): 424–445.
Bungum, Berit, Maria Vetleseter Bøe, and Ellen Karoline Henriksen. 2018. Quantum talk: how small-group discussions may enhance students’ understanding in quantum physics. Science Education 102 (4): 856–877.
Bungum, Berit, Ellen Karoline Henriksen, Carl Angell, Cathrine Wahlstrøm Tellefsen, and Maria Vetleseter Bøe. 2015. Relequant-improving teaching and learning in quantum physics through educational design research.
Gordy, Xiaoshan Z, Wesley Sparkmon, Hyllore Imeri, Andrew Notebaert, Marie Barnard, Caroline Compretta, Erin Dehon, Juanyce Taylor, Stephen Stray, Donna Sullivan, et al. 2021. Science teaching excites medical interest: a qualitative inquiry of science education during the 2020 covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences 11 (4): 148.
Griffiths, Alan K, and Kirk R Preston. 1992. Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of research in Science Teaching 29 (6): 611–628.
Henriksen, Ellen Karoline, Carl Angell, Arnt Inge Vistnes, and Berit Bungum. 2018. What is light? Science & education 27 (1): 81–111.
Johansson, Anders. 2018. Undergraduate quantum mechanics: lost opportunities for engaging motivated students? European journal of physics 39 (2): 025705.
Johnston, ID, K Crawford, and PR Fletcher. 1998. Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education 20 (4): 427–446.
Ke, Jiun-Liang, Martin Monk, and Richard Duschl. 2005. Learning introductory quantum physics: sensori-motor experiences and mental models. International Journal of Science Education 27 (13): 1571–1594.
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, Kim, Hendrik Jan Pol, Alexander Brinkman, and WR Van Joolingen. 2017. Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical review physics education research 13 (1): 010109.
Loughran, John. 2019. Pedagogical reasoning: the foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching 25 (5): 523–535.
Mannila, Katja, Ismo T Koponen, and Jouni A Niskanen. 2001. Building a picture of students’ conceptions of wave-and particle-like properties of quantum entities. European journal of physics 23 (1): 45.
McKagan, SB, KK Perkins, and CE Wieman. 2008. Why we should teach the bohr model and how to teach it effectively. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 4 (1): 010103.
Müller, Rainer, and Hartmut Wiesner. 2002. Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level. American Journal of physics 70 (3): 200–209.
Niaz, Mansoor, and Marıa A Rodrıguez. 2002. Improving learning by discussing controversies in 20th century physics. Physics education 37 (1): 59.
Petri, Juergen, and Hans Niedderer*. 1998. A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education 20 (9): 1075–1088.
Savall-Alemany, Francisco, Jenaro Guisasola, Sergio Rosa Cintas, and Joaquın Martınez-Torregrosa. 2019. Problem-based structure for a teaching-learning sequence to overcome students’ difficulties when learning about atomic spectra. Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (2): 020138.
Stadermann, HKE, Euwe van den Berg, and MJ Goedhart. 2019. Analysis of secondary school quantum physics curricula of 15 different countries: different perspectives on a challenging topic. Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (1): 010130.
Sundstrom, Meagan, Anna McLean Phillips, and NG Holmes. 2020. Problematizing in inquiry-based labs: how students respond to unexpected results. In Proceedings of the 2020 physics education research conference, virtual conference
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/ripe.v1i1.2095
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

Research in Physics Education (RiPE) is a scientific journal regularly published by Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika, Institut Pendidikan Indonesia (Jl. Pahlawan No.32, Garut,Indonesia). RiPE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © Institut Pendidikan Indonesia-Garut.