Analisis Buku Teks Pelajaran Matematika SMP ditinjau dari Literasi Matematika

Erik Suharyono, R. Rosnawati

Abstract


Abstrak

Literasi matematika merupakan salah satu tujuan pembelajaran matematika sehingga perlu termuat dalam buku teks matematika sebagai sumber utama belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan hasil analisis soal-soal pada buku teks pelajaran matematika SMP kelas VII semester II kurikulum 2013 ditinjau dari literasi matematika. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui teknik pengkodean, dan teknik analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari 408 soal yang dianalisis, terdapat 49,26% soal serupa dengan soal-soal pada PISA. Proporsi konteks didominasi oleh konteks umum dengan persentase 42,29%. Aspek proses didominasi oleh proses menggunakan konsep, fakta, prosedur, dan penalaran dengan persentase 66,17%. Selanjutnya, Level kompetensi matematika PISA didominasi oleh level 2 dengan persentase 52,74% dan level 1 dengan persentase 39,80%. Kurang dari 10% untuk level 3 sampai 6. Hal tersebut berarti bahwa soal-soal pada buku teks hanya mampu melatih peserta didik di level 2 kompetensi matematika PISA. Diperlukan sumber belajar lainnya yang dapat melengkapi kekurangan tersebut.

 

Analysis of Mathematics Textbooks for Middle School based on Mathematics Literacy

Abstract

Mathematical literacy skills are one of the goals of learning mathematics, so that mathematical literacy needs to be included in mathematics textbooks as the main source of learning. The purposed study is to describe mathematical literacy in the items of a question in the 7th second-semester mathematic textbooks. This study was descriptive research. Data were collected through coding techniques. The reliability coefficient of the data is 0, 909. The results indicate that of the 408 items question, there is 49.26% that were similar to the questions on PISA. The dominant aspect of context is the societal context by 42.29%. The dominated process aspect is mathematical concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning by 66.17%. Furthermore, the dominated PISA's mathematics competency level is level 2 by 52.74% and level 1 by 39.80%. Less than 10% for levels 3 to 6. This means that the questions in the textbook are only able to train students in level 2 PISA mathematics competence. Other learning resources are needed that can complement these shortcomings


Keywords


textbook; mathematics literacy; PISA; buku teks; literasi matematika; PISA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriansyah, E. A., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). Design Research in Fraction for Prospective Teachers. The 5th SEA-DR (South East Asia Development Research) International Conference 2017 (SEADRIC 2017). Advances in Social Science, Education, 100. 91-97.

Čeretková, S., Šedivý, O., Molnár, J., & Petr, D. (2008). The role and assessment of textbooks in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Problems of Education in 21st Century

Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional 22 Tahun 2006.

De Porter, B. & Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum Learning. Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Terjemahan oleh Alwiyah Abdurrahman. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa.

Fatwa, V. C., Septian, A., & Inayah, S. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3). 389-398

IEA. (2012). TIMSS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in mathematics and science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College

Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2009). Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 173-181

Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Second ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Peblications, Inc.

Li, Y., Zhang, J., & Ma, T. (2009). Approaches and practices in developing school mathematics texbooks in China. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41. 733-748.

Lyche, T., & Morken, K.. (2004). Spline Methods, Draft, Retrieved from http://www.ub.uio.n./umn/english/index.html, on 23th Feb 2005.

Masduki, Subandriah, M. R., Irawan, D. Y., Prihantoro, A. (2013). Level Kognitif soal-soal Pada Buku Teks Matematika SMP Kelas VII. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY.

Matic, L. J., & Gracin, D., G. (2016). The use of the textbook as an artefact in the classroom A case study in the light of a socio-didactical tetrahedron. J Math Didakt, 37. 349–374.

Muslich, M. (2010). Textbook Writing, Dasar-dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media

Muzaki, A., & Masjudi. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3). 493-502.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework.

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: are we able to put the mathematics we learm into everyday use. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1). 89-100.

Priyambodo, S., & Maryati, I. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Statistis melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek yang Dimodifikasi. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2). 273-284.

Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (Third ed.) Huboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Wijaya, A. (2013). Pentingnya analisis buku peserta didik dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013. PPPPTK Matematika. 1-4.

Wijaya, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-Learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1). 41-65.

World Bank. (2010). Inside Indonesia’s mathematics classrooms: A TIMSS video study of teaching practices and student achievment. Jakarta: The World Bank Office.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i3.819

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Indexed by:

 

Creative Commons License
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

 

View My Stats