Pengaruh Efikasi Diri, Optimisme, dan Kompetensi Penggunaan AI pada Kemampuan Pembelajaran Mandiri Siswa Generasi Z

Authors

  • Rengga Prakoso Nugroho Teknologi Pendidikan ID
  • Elizabeth Lobo Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Wilfridus Nggadung Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Citra Kurniawan Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/petik.v11i1.2170

Keywords:

kemandirian belajar, Mobile Learning, generasi Z

Abstract

Abstrak

Kemandirian belajar merupakan salah satu kompetensi penting yang dapat mendukung pebelajar dalam menghadapi tantangan pembelajaran di era digital. Mobile learning telah menjadi pendekatan pembelajaran yang dapat mempromosikan kemandirian belajar, namun keberhasilannya dipengaruhi oleh faktor internal pebelajar seperti efikasi diri, optimisme, dan kompetensi teknologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh efikasi diri, optimisme, dan kompetensi dalam menggunakan kecerdasan buatan terhadap kemandirian belajar generasi Z. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif menggunakan metode survei terhadap sekelompok siswa SMA di Malang. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan angket dengan skala Likert dan dianalisis melalui regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara parsial maupun simultan, efikasi diri, optimisme, dan kompetensi penggunaan kecerdasan buatan tidak memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kemandirian belajar. Tingkat kontribusi variabel-variabel tersebut tergolong rendah, di mana sebagian besar variabilitas kemandirian belajar dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain di luar penelitian ini. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa penerapan mobile learning membutuhkan pendekatan yang lebih komprehensif, termasuk memperhatikan faktor-faktor eksternal seperti dukungan institusi dan kesiapan teknologi.

Kata Kunci: kemandirian belajar, mobile learning, generasi Z

Abstract

Self-directed learning is a crucial competency that supports learners in overcoming challenges in the digital era. Mobile learning has emerged as an educational approach that promotes self-directed learning, but its effectiveness is influenced by internal factors such as self-efficacy, optimism, and technological competence. This study aims to analyze the influence of self-efficacy, optimism, and artificial intelligence competence on the self- directed learning of Generation Z. The research employed a quantitative approach with a survey method involving a group of high school students in Malang. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The findings indicate that self-efficacy, optimism, and artificial intelligence competence, both individually and collectively, do not significantly influence self- directed learning. The contribution level of these variables is relatively low, with most of the variability in self- directed learning being affected by other factors beyond this study. These results suggest that the implementation of mobile learning requires a more comprehensive approach, including consideration of external factors such as institutional support and technological readiness.

Keyword: self-directed learning, mobile learning, Generation Z

References

S. L. Boyer, D. R. Edmondson, A. B. Artis, dan D. Fleming, “Self-Directed Learning: A Tool for Lifelong Learning,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 36, no. 1, hlm. 20–32, Apr 2014, doi: 10.1177/0273475313494010.

M. Bagheri, W. Z. W. Ali, M. C. B. Abdullah, dan S. M. Daud, “Effects of Project-based Learning Strategy on Self-directed Learning Skills of Educational Technology Students,” Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar 2013, Diakses: 8 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cet/issue/25731/271474

S. Karimi, “Do learners’ characteristics matter? An exploration of mobile-learning adoption in self-directed learning,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 63, hlm. 769–776, Okt 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.014.

K.-O. Jeong, “Facilitating Sustainable Self-Directed Learning Experience with the Use of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, hlm. 2894, Mar 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14052894.

S. Bartholomew, E. Reeve, R. Veon, W. Goodridge, V. Lee, dan L. Nadelson, “Relationships Between Access to Mobile Devices, Student Self-Directed Learning, and Achievement,” Faculty Publications, Sep 2017, doi: 10.21061/jte.v29i1.a.1.

R. P. N. Nugroho, “Pengembangan learning management system dengan pendekatan gamifikasi untuk pembelajaran berbasis proyek / Rengga Prakoso Nugroho,” diploma, Universitas Negeri Malang, 2024. Diakses: 5 Agustus 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://repository.um.ac.id/305639/

R. P. Nugroho, S. Nurhidayah, Y. Soepriyanto, dan P. Purnomo, “Acceptance Analysis of Learning Management System in Project-based Learning,” JF, vol. 14, no. 1, hlm. 122–128, Apr 2024, doi: 10.37859/jf.v14i1.6859.

W. B. Utami, D. Kuswandi, Y. Soepriyanto, dan F. Aulia, “Development of Online Web Learning with Ethnomatematics Content on Self Regulated Learning,” JTP, vol. 25, no. 1, hlm. 62–75, Apr 2023, doi: 10.21009/jtp.v25i1.31705.

C. Kurniawan, O. Fajarianto, I. Novitasari, T. C. Wulandari, dan E. Marlina, “Assessing Learning Management System (LMS) for The Dairy Farmer: Obstacles to Delivering Online Learning Content,” JTP, vol. 24, no. 3, hlm. 341–352, Des 2022, doi: 10.21009/jtp.v24i3.31453.

E. Chung, G. Subramaniam, dan L. C. Dass, “Online Learning Readiness among University Students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 16, no. 2, hlm. 46–58, Jul 2020, Diakses: 8 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1267359

F. Martin, B. Stamper, dan C. Flowers, “Examining Student Perception of Readiness for Online Learning: Importance and Confidence,” Online Learning, vol. 24, no. 2, hlm. 38–58, Jun 2020, Diakses: 8 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1260328

N. Fadiawati, C. Diawati, dan M. M. F. Syamsuri, “Using Problem-Based Learning To Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills To Deal Hoax Information In Chemistry,” Periodico Tche Quimica, vol. 17, no. 35, Art. no. 35, Jul 2020, Diakses: 8 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://deboni.he.com.br/Periodico35.pdf

S. Criollo-C, A. Guerrero-Arias, Á. Jaramillo-Alcázar, dan S. Luján-Mora, “Mobile Learning Technologies for Education: Benefits and Pending Issues,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Jan 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11094111.

A. Togaibayeva, D. Ramazanova, M. Yessengulova, A. Yergazina, A. Nurlin, dan R. Shokanov, “Effect of mobile learning on students’ satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and academic performance when learning a foreign language,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, Sep 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.946102.

N. Sa’idah dan A. Saefudin, “Implementation Of M-Learning to Improve Learning Effectiveness In PAI Evaluation System Courses,” Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas dan Intelektualitas, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun 2024, doi: 10.31942/pgrs.v12i1.10695.

S. Meisaroh dan Suparno, “Development of Android-Based Interactive Mobile Learning with Guided Inquiry Models to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills on Light Wave Material,” jppipa, pendidikan ipa, fisika, biologi, kimia, vol. 10, no. 2, hlm. 522–529, Feb 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i2.4869.

D. A. Andrian dkk., “Android-Based Learning Media in Improving Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes :,” Dinamisia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 8, no. 5, hlm. 1374–1388, Okt 2024, doi: 10.31849/dinamisia.v8i5.23026.

H.-H. Lin, S. Lin, C.-H. Yeh, dan Y.-S. Wang, “Measuring mobile learning readiness: scale development and validation,” Internet Research, vol. 26, no. 1, hlm. 265–287, Feb 2016, doi: 10.1108/IntR-10-2014-0241.

Y.-Y. Wang dan Y.-W. Chuang, “Artificial intelligence self-efficacy: Scale development and validation,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 29, no. 4, hlm. 4785–4808, Mar 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12015-w.

R. K. Kampa, “Combining technology readiness and acceptance model for investigating the acceptance of m-learning in higher education in India,” AAOUJ, vol. 18, no. 2, hlm. 105–120, Nov 2023, doi: 10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2022-0149.

S. A. Pangestu, P. Setyosari, dan D. Kuswandi, “Analisis Persepsi Mobile Learning Readiness Dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Jawa,” JKTP J. Kaji. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 3, hlm. 152, Agu 2023, doi: 10.17977/um038v6i32023p152.

H. Murcahyanto, “Penerapan Media Chat GPT pada Pembelajaran Manajemen Pendidikan terhadap Kemandirian Mahasiswa,” Edumatic, vol. 7, no. 1, hlm. 115–122, Jun 2023, doi: 10.29408/edumatic.v7i1.14073.

F. K. Ramadhan, M. I. Faris, I. Wahyudi, dan M. K. Sulaeman, “Pemanfaatan Chat GPT Dalam Dunia Pendidikan,” Jurnal Ilmiah Flash, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun 2023, doi: 10.32511/flash.v9i1.1069.

G. Beutel, E. Geerits, dan J. T. Kielstein, “Artificial hallucination: GPT on LSD?,” Crit Care, vol. 27, no. 1, hlm. 148, Apr 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04425-6.

T. R. McIntosh, T. Liu, T. Susnjak, P. Watters, A. Ng, dan M. N. Halgamuge, “A Culturally Sensitive Test to Evaluate Nuanced GPT Hallucination,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 6, hlm. 2739–2751, Jun 2024, doi: 10.1109/TAI.2023.3332837.

R. Emsley, “ChatGPT: these are not hallucinations – they’re fabrications and falsifications,” Schizophr, vol. 9, no. 1, hlm. 1–2, Agu 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00379-4.

D.-M. Park dan H.-J. Lee, “Literature Review of AI Hallucination Research Since the Advent of ChatGPT: Focusing on Papers from arXiv,” Informatization Policy, vol. 31, no. 2, hlm. 3–38, 2024, doi: 10.22693/NIAIP.2024.31.2.003.

K. Metze, R. C. Morandin-Reis, I. Lorand-Metze, dan J. B. Florindo, “Bibliographic Research with ChatGPT may be Misleading: The Problem of Hallucination,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 59, no. 1, hlm. 158, Jan 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.08.018.

Z. Ahmad, W. Kaiser, dan S. Rahim, “Hallucinations in ChatGPT: An Unreliable Tool for Learning,” rupkatha, vol. 15, no. 4, Des 2023, doi: 10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.17.

K. Marlin, E. Tantrisna, B. Mardikawati, R. Anggraini, dan E. Susilawati, “Manfaat dan Tantangan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligences (AI) Chat GPT Terhadap Proses Pendidikan Etika dan Kompetensi Mahasiswa Di Perguruan Tinggi,” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, vol. 3, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Des 2023, Diakses: 9 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/7119

W. Lupita dan D. Armono, “Analisis Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Generasi Z: Studi Kasus Pada Siswa Keahlian Kompetensi Akuntansi Smk Negeri 7 Yogyakarta,” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, vol. 21, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Des 2023, doi: 10.21831/jpai.v21i2.66303.

E. J. Cilliers, “The Challenge Of Teaching Generation Z,” People: International Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan 2017, doi: 10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198.

Z. E. Csobanka, “The Z Generation,” Acta Technologica Dubnicae, vol. 6, no. 2, hlm. 63–76, Agu 2016, doi: 10.1515/atd-2016-0012.

A. Carolus, M. J. Koch, S. Straka, M. E. Latoschik, dan C. Wienrich, “MAILS - Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change- and meta-competencies,” Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, vol. 1, no. 2, hlm. 100014, Agu 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014.

C. S. Chai, D. Yu, R. B. King, dan Y. Zhou, “Development and Validation of the Artificial Intelligence Learning Intention Scale (AILIS) for University Students,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 2, hlm. 21582440241242188, Apr 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241242188.

S. Kurniasih, D. Darwan, dan A. Muchyidin, “Menumbuhkan Kemandirian Belajar Matematika Siswa Melalui Mobile Learning Berbasis Android,” JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, vol. 8, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep 2020, doi: 10.25273/jems.v8i2.7041.

M. N. Huda, M. Mulyono, I. Rosyida, dan W. Wardono, “Kemandirian Belajar Berbantuan Mobile Learning,” PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, vol. 2, hlm. 798–806, Feb 2019, Diakses: 11 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/29270

L. N. Aulia, S. Susilo, dan B. Subali, “Upaya peningkatan kemandirian belajar siswa dengan model problem-based learning berbantuan media Edmodo,” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr 2019, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v5i1.18707.

N. Syaputrizal dan R. Jannah, “Media Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Mobile Learning pada Platform Android Menggunakan Aplikasi App Inventor untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar Peserta Didik,” Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA dan Pendidikan IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar 2019, doi: 10.15548/nsc.v5i1.901.

H.-J. Kim dan J.-Y. Rha, “Predicting the Drivers of the Intention to Use Mobile Learning in South Korea,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan 2018, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v12i1.7688.

I. M. Suwitra, I. N. Nurjaya, P. D. Astuti, A. D. Y. Pratama, dan R. Rahim, WICSTH 2021: Proceedings of the 1st Warmadewa International Conference on Science, Technology and Humanity, WICSTH 2021, 7-8 September 2021, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. European Alliance for Innovation, 2022.

S. Akkaya, F. M. Cigerci, dan M. Kapidere, “Investigation of the Relationship between Prospective Teachers’ Attitudes towards Mobile Learning and Their Readiness for Mobile Learning,” International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, vol. 8, no. 4, hlm. 2949–2965, 2021, Diakses: 11 Desember 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1319321

B. Karan dan G. R. Angadi, “Potential Risks of Artificial Intelligence Integration into School Education: A Systematic Review,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 43, no. 3–4, hlm. 67–85, Des 2023, doi: 10.1177/02704676231224705.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

Rengga Prakoso Nugroho, Lobo, E., Nggadung, W., & Kurniawan, C. (2025). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri, Optimisme, dan Kompetensi Penggunaan AI pada Kemampuan Pembelajaran Mandiri Siswa Generasi Z. Petik: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 11(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.31980/petik.v11i1.2170