EFL Learning Style Preferences of Junior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v8i1.2609Keywords:
Language Learning Styles, Gender differences, Visual learning, Classroom ActivitiesAbstract
This study explored the preferred language learning styles (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic - VAK) among ninth-grade students in English class and examined gender-based differences in these preferences, as well as the preferred classroom activities aligned with each learning style. Using a mixed-method approach, quantitative data were collected through the 24-item Barsch Learning Styles Inventory (BLSI) from 189 students and analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative data were gathered from semi-structured interviews with 10 students and analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings revealed that visual learning was the most preferred style overall gender, chosen by 68% of participants, followed by auditory learning (17%) and kinesthetic learning (15%). Gender differences were observed, with female students favoring auditory styles, male students preferring kinesthetic methods, and both genders equally preferred visual learning. This study also found that students expressed a strong preference for activities that align with visual learning, including the use of visual materials, highlighting or color-coding text, and incorporating symbols and animations. Additionally, activities involving such as independent reading, note-taking, and using videos or films were highlighted for their effectiveness in fostering comprehension, retention, and engagement. The dominance of visual learning styles emphasizes the need for educators to prioritize visual materials in their teaching strategies. However, the presence of auditory and kinesthetic learners highlights the importance of a multimodal teaching approach.
References
Alabi, M. (2024). Visual Learning : The Power of Visual Aids and Multimedia.
Alonso-Martín, P., Cruz-Díaz, R., Granado-Alcón, C., Lago-Urbano, R., & Martínez-García, C. (2021). Variability of higher education students’ learning styles depending on gender, course, degree and institutional context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041659
Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic Engagement: An Overview of Its Definitions, Dimensions, and Major Conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p41
Baglama, B., Yucesoy, Y., & Yikmis, A. (2018). Using animation as a means of enhancing learning of individuals with special needs. TEM Journal, 7(3), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM73-26
Bajrami, L., & Ismaili, M. (2016). The Role of Video Materials in EFL Classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 502–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.068
Barsch, J. (1996). Barsch Learning Styles Inventory. Academic Therapy Publication, 23–25. https://www.honolulu.hawaii.edu/facdev/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/1-5_Barsh-Learning-Styles.pdf
Bonomo Ed. D., V. (2017). Brain-Based Learning Theory. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n1a3
Bransford, J. d. (2004). How people learn - brain, mind, experience and school. National Academy of Sciences.
Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2015). The pitfalls of visual representations: A review and classification of common errors made while designing and interpreting visualizations. SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015611451
Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make It Stick: The science of successful learning. In Make It Stick. Harvard University Press Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674419377
Cary, M., & Carlson, R. A. (1999). External Support and the Development of Problem-Solving Routines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1053
Castelló, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10674-005-8557-4
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076
Dang Thi Kim Chung, M. A. (2023). The Efficacy of Visual Aids in Enhancing Vocabulary Acquisition in EFL Classes. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(10), 6397–6403. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-80
Diachenko, I., Kalishchuk, S., Zhylin, M., Kyyko, A., & Volkova, Y. (2022). Color education: A study on methods of influence on memory. Heliyon, 8(11), e11607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11607
Dzulkifli, M. A., & Mustafar, M. F. (2013). The influence of colour on memory performance: a review. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS, 20(2), 3–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23983571%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3743993
El-Emadi, A. A., Said, Z., & Friesen, H. L. (2019). Teaching style differences between male and female science teachers in qatari schools: Possible impact on student achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109236
Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Basics of statistics for primary care research. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000067
Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214414
Ivankova, N., & Creswell, J. (2009). Mixed methods. In Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics A Practical Introduction (p. 135).
James KPOLOVIE, P., Igho JOE, A., & Okoto, T. (2014). Academic Achievement Prediction: Role of Interest in Learning and Attitude towards School. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(11), 73–100. www.arcjournals.org
Kahu, E., Nelson, K., & Picton, C. (2017). Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year students. Student Success, 8(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.379
Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. (n.d.). Kurikulum Merdeka. Direktorat SMP.
Khalidiyah, H. (2015). THE USE OF ANIMATED VIDEO IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING SKILL (A Quasi-Experimental Study of Seventh Grade Student at A Junior High School in Jalancagak, Subang). Journal of English and Education, 3(1), 59–79.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. In CWL Publishing Enterprises, Inc., Madison. Pergamon Press Inc. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbdv.200490137/abstract
Ladd, G. T. (1887). ELEMENTS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY.
Mayer, R. E. (2002a). Multimedia Learning. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 41, 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_285
Mayer, R. E. (2002b). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Mayer, R. E., & Pilegard, C. (2014). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition, 316–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.016
McCarter, K. M. (2008). The effect of auditory stimulation on learners with different learning styles (Issue September).
Middendorf, C. H., & Macan, T. H. (2002). Note-taking in the employment interview: Effects on recall and judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 293.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086
Rahmaniar, Surahmat, Z., Sardi, A., & Nurnaifah, I. I. (2024). Challenge and Opportunities: A Qualitative Exploration of Junior High School English Language Educators’ Perspectives on Implementing Differentiated Instruction. Jelita, 5(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v5i1.597
Silitonga, F. D. E., Pinem, S. M., Simbolon, L., Lingga, L. M., & Saragih, E. (2020). Learning Style in Language Learning Classroom. Yavana Bhasha : Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.25078/yb.v1i1.1377
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Verdi, M. P., & Kulhavy, R. W. (2002). Learning with maps and texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013128426099
Vincent, & Ross. (2001). Learning Style Awareness A Basis For Developing Teaching and Learning Strategies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5), 1–10.
Waang, G. P. (2023). Maximizing the Potential of Multimedia in Indonesia: Enhancing Engagement, Accessibility, and Learning Outcomes. Academic Society for Appropriate Technology, 9(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.37675/jat.2023.00409
Widgit Education. (2014). Symbols in Education. www.symbolsinclusionproject.org%0A26
Yulisda, N. (2021). Exploring students’ learning styles in english learning process (A Case Study at SMPN 1 Bengkalis).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
