BARRIERS OF ONLINE READING LEARNING FACED BY COLLEGE STUDENTS

Authors

  • Gesha Lailatul Fauziyyah Islamic Elementary School Najaahaan
  • Alina Lemieshevska Secondary School of Selidove
  • Lucky Rahayu Nurjamin Institut Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Asep Suparman Institut Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal.v6i1.42

Keywords:

Reading, Reading Barrier, Online Learning

Abstract

In the online reading classroom, the learning activity is different from offline reading learning. It engages the internet and technology to read, comprehend, and learn new information. However, those skills perceive some barriers in the process of learning in students during online reading learning. This qualitative study examined the descriptions of the barriers in reading online learning in a college from students’ perspectives. This study was conducted in one of the private universities in West Java, Indonesia. The participants of this study were 7 college students and one reading lecturer. This study applied the interview and observation as the data collection. The finding of this study has resulted 5 barriers of online reading learning with some description for each barrier. Those barriers are; epistemological barriers, infrastructure barriers, attitudinal barriers, technical barriers, and financial barriers.

References

Abramenka, V. (2015). Students ’ Motivations and Barriers to Online Education.

Abuhammad, S. (2020). Heliyon Barriers to distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak : A qualitative review from parents ’ perspective. Heliyon, 6(July), e05482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05482

Ad, R. M., Sutarsyah, C., & Suparman, U. (2014). MAIN IDEA OF READING TEXT Reading plays an important role in developing knowledge . Through reading students can absorb all the information , experience and ideas provided in books . Afflerbach ( 2007 : 12-13 ) as quoted by Dewi ( 2013 ) says that reading. U-JET, 3(7), 1–15.

Alhunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R. A., & Al-sharhan, S. (2016). Prospects and Challenges of Mobile Learning Implementation: A Case Study on Kuwait Higher Education. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.12.001

Almaiah, M. A., Al-khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic.

Anwar, M., Khan, A., & Sultan, K. (2020). Gomal university. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 36(1), 52–62.

Arkorful, V. (2014). The role of e-learning , the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in Higher Education . International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 397–410.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Intorduction to Research in Education (8th Editio). Nelson Education, Ltd.

Becker, K., Newton, C., & Sawang, S. (2013). A learner perspective on barriers to e-learning. 53(2).

Berardo, S. A. (2006). The Reading Matrix Vol. 6, No. 2, September 2006. 6(2), 60–69.

Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). STUDENTS ’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE USE OF ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORMS IN EFL CLASSROOM. 1(1), 22–30.

Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J. G., O’Byrne, W. I. L., & Donald, J. (2011). The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: New Opportunities and Challenges for Students with Learning Difficulties. University of California, Berkeley, 91–110. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8864-3_4,

Coiro, J., & Schmar-Dobler, B. (2005). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Exploring the comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers as they search for and locate information on the Internet. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Connecticut.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and (Fourth Edi). Pearson.

Doyumğaç, İ., Tanhan, A., & Kiymaz, M. S. (2021). Understanding the Most Important Facilitators and Barriers for Online Education during COVID-19 through Online Photovoice Methodology. 10(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p166

Hasan, M. I. (2002). Pokok-pokok Materi Metode Penelitian dan Aplikasinya. Ghalia Indonesia.

Jones, P. R., & Ph, D. (2016). The Structure and Pedagogical Style of the Virtual Developmental Education Classroom : Benefit or Barrier to the Developmental Learning Process ? 4(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v4n1a5

Khoury, A., Eddeen, L. N., & Harfoushi, O. (2011). E-Learning: Justifications and Obstacles. September. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v6i3.1610

Leu, D. J., Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Coiro, J., Henry, L. A., & Lyver, S. (2005). The new literacies of online reading comprehension. The Nera Journal.

Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B. C., Liu, Y., Neil, M. O., Rush, L. S., Eakle, A. J., & Berger, A. (2005). What Is New About The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension ? To appear in : 1–18.

Luyt, I. (2013). Bridging spaces: Cross-cultural perspectives on promoting positive online learning experiences. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42 (1)(3–20).

Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2014). Student Barriers to Online Learning : A. May 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269

Mulyadi, D. (2018). Efl student teachers’ perception and challenges toward online platforms in language pedagogy. 2, 321–323.

Nugroho, A. (2020). Online Learning amidst Global Pandemic : EFL Students ’ Challenges , Online Learning amidst Global Pandemic : EFL Students ’ Challenges , Suggestions , and Needed Materials. November. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v4i2.1494

Qifu, W. (2013). A study of barriers to online learning in distance education in China.

Sari, N., & Muljo, A. (2012). eLearning Obstacle Faced by Indonesian Students. February, 23–24.

Uri, D., & Coiro, J. (2014). Online Reading Comprehension : Challenges and Opportunities. 7(2), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.17851/1983-3652.7.2.30-43

Downloads

Published

2023-03-27

How to Cite

Fauziyyah, G. L., Lemieshevska, A., Nurjamin, L. R., & Suparman , A. (2023). BARRIERS OF ONLINE READING LEARNING FACED BY COLLEGE STUDENTS. English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal), 6(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal.v6i1.42