HOW ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IS PERCEIVED BY EFL BILINGUAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER

Authors

  • Novia Mustika Dewi Institut Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ainun Putri Nurdiya Institut Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Mitha Mediana Sukandar Institut Pendidikan Indonesia
  • ucky Rahayu Nurjamin Institut Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal.v6i2.46

Keywords:

Bilingual Primary School, EFL Teacher, Elicitation, Oral Corrective Feedback (OCF)

Abstract

Oral corrective feedback (OCF) is one of the important teaching methods because it can aid the students in the learning process. The EFL teacher in bilingual primary schools was studied for this research because they are still in under research. This study tries to find out how oral corrective feedback (OCF) is perceived by EFL bilingual primary school teachers. This study used case study. The data were collected using semi-structured interview with one of the teacher. The findings of this research, there are four kinds of oral corrective feedback (OCF) that used often by the teacher in the learning process that are, recast, repetition, elicitation and paralinguistic signals and the mechanism used bases on the situations individually or group correction. The second findings of this research is from the teacher perspective giving oral corrective feedback (OCF) can be easier for students to remember the correction from the teacher

References

Agudo, J. d. (2005). Teaching and Learning English through ICT. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 1-7.

Alsolami, R. (2019). Effect of Oral Corrective Feedback on Language Skills. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 672-677.

Cauley, K. M. (2010). Formative Assessment Tecniques to Support Student Motivation and Achivment. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(1), 1-6.

Chaudron, C. (2018). Teachers' priorities in correcting learners' errors in French immersion classes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 6(11), 951-952., 3(1), 10-27, 64 - 84.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Educational Research. In Library of Congress Cataloging (Vol. 4, Issue August).

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal 1(1), 2-18.

Ellis., R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning: Research, theory, applications, implications.

Elsaghayer, M. (2014). ‘Affective Damage to Oral Corrective Feedback among Students in Libyan Secondary Schools.’. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(6), 74-82.

Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals. 583-593.

Felix, S. W. (1978). Languagee Aqcuisition and Language Learning. In System ( Vol 6, Issue 2).

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Acquiring a second language. World Englishes, 97-101.

Long, M. H. (1997). Teacher feedback on learner error: Mapping cognition. In D. H. Brown, C. C. A. Yorio, & T. R. Crymes (Eds.), vol. 77. On TESOL, 278 - 294.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language acquisition, 19(01), 37-66.

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral Corrective Feedback in Second Language Classroom. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.

Maolida, E. H. (2009). Oral Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake In A Young Learner EFL Classroom (A Case Study In AnEnglish Course In Bandung). Univesitas Pendidikan Indonesia I repository.upi.edu I perpestakaan.upi.edu, 1- 6.

McMilan, K. M. (2010). Formative Assessment Techniques to Support Student Motivation and Achievement. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 1-6.

Muhsin, A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Positive Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skill. Lingua Cultura, 10(1), 25, 25-30.

Muslem, A., Zulfikar, T., Astila, I., Heiansyah, H., & Marhaban, S. (2021). Students’ Perception Toward Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Classes. 244-256.

Nassaji, H. (2013). Participation Structure and Incidental Focus on Form in Adult ESL Classrooms. Language Learning Volume 63, Issue 4, 835-869.

Nystrom njuk. (1983). Teacher-student interaction in bilingual classrooms: Four approaches to error correction. In H. W. Seliger, & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition, 169 - 189.

Rahimi, M. (2010). Iranian EFL Students’ Perception and Preferences for Teachers’ Written Feedback: Do Students’ Ideas Reflect Teachers’ Practice? The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 75 – 98.

Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2015). Exploring non-native English-speaking teachers' cognitions about corrective feedback in teaching English oral communication . System,55, 111-122.

Rassaei, E. (2017). Effects of three forms of reading-based output activity on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 76-95.

Shegar, C., Zhang, L. J., & Low, E. L. (2013). Effects of an input–output mapping practice task on EFL learners’ acquisition of two grammatical structures. System 41, 443-461.

Siska, W., Mukhaiyar., & Ratmanida. (2018). English teachers’ strategies in giving oral corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance. Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-6), 158-168.

Truscott, J. (2007). The Effect of Error Correction on Learners’ Ability to Write Accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272.

Zhang & Rahimi. (2013). EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes.

Zhao, Y., Yi, Z., Gentekaki, E., Zhan, A., Al-Farraj, S. A., & Song, W. (2016). Utility of combining morphological characters, nuclear and mitochondrial genes: An attempt to resolve the conflicts of species identification for ciliated protists. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 94(February), 718-729.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-19

How to Cite

Dewi, N. M., Nurdiya, A. P., Sukandar, M. M., & Nurjamin, ucky R. (2023). HOW ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IS PERCEIVED BY EFL BILINGUAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER. English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal), 6(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.31980/eeal.v6i2.46