Stories of physics teachers teaching special relativity concepts in senior high school
Keywords:
Special Relativity, Physics Education, Teaching StrategiesAbstract
Teaching Special Relativity in senior high school presents significant challenges due to its abstract and counterintuitive concepts, which often contradict students’ everyday experiences. This study employs a narrative research approach to explore the experiences of three physics teachers in teaching Special Relativity. The findings reveal that teachers struggle with explaining relativistic effects such as time dilation, length contraction, and simultaneity, as students frequently hold persistent misconceptions influenced by classical mechanics and popular media. Furthermore, curriculum constraints and the lack of appropriate instructional resources hinder effective teaching. The study identifies key pedagogical strategies, including the use of interactive simulations, thought experiments, and historical contexts, to make relativity more accessible. Teachers emphasize the need for conceptual scaffolding before introducing mathematical derivations to ensure students grasp the fundamental principles. Despite the challenges, teachers express passion and excitement when students experience conceptual breakthroughs, highlighting the transformative power of physics education. This study underscores the importance of professional development programs and curriculum adjustments to better support teachers in delivering relativity concepts effectively. Future research should explore additional instructional interventions to enhance relativity education in high schools.
References
Arriassecq, Irene, and Ileana María Greca. 2012. A teaching–learning sequence for the special relativity theory at high school level historically and epistemologically contextualized. Science & Education 21:827–851.
Candido, Keneth John O, King Christian C Gillesania, Justine C Mercado, and Joy Mae B Reales. 2022. Interactive simulation on modern physics: a systematic review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research 3 (8): 1452–1462.
Clandinin, D Jean. 2006. Narrative inquiry: a methodology for studying lived experience. Research studies in music education 27 (1): 44–54.
Dimitriadi, Kyriaki, and Krystallia Halkia. 2012. Secondary students’ understanding of basic ideas of special relativity. International Journal of Science Education 34 (16): 2565–2582.
Duit, Reinders, and David F Treagust. 2003. Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International journal of science education 25 (6): 671–688.
Fan, Xinxin. 2015. Effectiveness of an inquiry-based learning using interactive simulations for enhancing students’ conceptual understanding in physics.
Hargreaves, Andy. 2001. Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers college record 103 (6): 1056–1080.
Hargreaves, Andy.2004. Teaching in a box: emotional geographies of teaching. In Developing teachers and teaching practice, 27–49. Routledge.
Kamphorst, Floor, MJ Vollebregt, ER Savelsbergh, and WR Van Joolingen. 2023. An educational reconstruction of special relativity theory for secondary education. Science & Education 32 (1): 57–100.
Scherr, Rachel E, Peter S Shaffer, and Stamatis Vokos. 2001. Student understanding of time in special relativity: simultaneity and reference frames. American Journal of Physics 69 (S1): S24–S35.
Souza, Maira Giovana de, Agostinho Serrano, and David Treagust. 2024. Exploring the relationship between mental representations and conceptual understanding of special relativity by high school students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–26.
Villani, Alberto, and Sergio M Arruda. 1998. Special theory of relativity, conceptual change and history of science. Science & Education 7:85-100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.