Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif-Implusif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i2.1097Keywords:
Represetasi Matematis, Sistem Persamaan Linear, Gaya Kognitif Reflektif-Implusif, Mathematical Representation, Linear Equation System, Reflective-Implusive Cognitive StyleAbstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan representasi matematis siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear dan untuk mendeskripsikan representasi matematis siswa bergaya kognitif implusif dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear. Peneliti menetapkan empat subjek penelitian dari hasil tes gaya kognitif reflektif-implusif yang terdiri dari dua subjek bergaya kognitif reflektif dan dua subjek bergaya kognitif implusif. Peneliti melakukan tes masalah sistem persamaan linear dan wawancara terhadap ke empat subjek tersebut. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif mampu menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear menggunakan representasi visual dan simbolik, serta siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif mampu menggunakan representasi verbal namun masih kurang tepat. sedangkan sisiwa bergaya kongnitif implusif mampu menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear menggunakan representasi verbal.
The purpose of this study is to describe the mathematical representation of students with reflective cognitive style in solving linear equation system problems and to describe the mathematical representation of students with impulsive cognitive style in solving linear equation system problems. Researchers set four research subjects from the results of the reflective-impulsive cognitive style test consisting of two subjects with reflective cognitive style and two with impulsive cognitive style. The researcher conducted tests on the system of linear equations and interviewed the four subjects. The type of research used is a case study with a qualitative approach. Data analysis techniques are data reduction, presentation, and conclusions. The results showed that students with reflective cognitive styles could solve linear equation system problems using visual and symbolic representations, and students with reflective cognitive styles could use verbal representations but were still not precise. while students with impulsive cognitive style are able to solve linear equation system problems using verbal representations.
References
Absorin, A., & Sugiman, S. (2018). Eksplorasi kemampuan penalaran dan representasi matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pythagoras, 13(2), 189-202.
Afriansyah, E. A., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Prospective teachers’ thinking through realistic mathematics education based emergent modeling in fractions. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 605-618.
Azizah, L. N., Junaedi, I., & Suhito, S. (2018). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Kelas X pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Model Problem Based Learning. PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, (Vol 2), 355-365.
Buckley, C., & Nerantzi, C. (2020). Effective use of visual representation in research and teaching within higher education. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 7(3), 196-214.
Çelik, H. C. (2018). The effects of activity-based learning on sixth grade students’ achievement and attitudes towards mathematics activities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1963-1977.
Chen, Y. T., Liou, S., & Chen, L. F. (2019). The relationships among gender, cognitive styles, learning strategies, and learning performance in the flipped classroom. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 395-403.
Chen, C. (2021). A Study on the Relationship Between Reflective-impulsive Cognitive Styles and Oral Proficiency of EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(7), 836-841.
Costa, R. D., Souza, G. F., Valentim, R. A., & Castro, T. B. (2020). The theory of learning styles applied to distance learning. Cognitive Systems Research, 64, 134-145.
Damayanti, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Perbandingan kemampuan representasi matematis siswa antara contextual teaching and learning dan problem-based learning. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 7(1), 30-39.
Fadiana, M. (2016). Perbedaan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Antara Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Implusif. Journal of research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 79-89.
Hidayati, A. N., & Kurniasari, I. (2021). Students’mathematical Connection Processes In Problem Posing Based On Reflective-Impulsive Cognitive Style. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Volume, 10(3).
Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Hendri, S. (2019). Mathematical Connection of Elementary School Students to Solve Mathematical Problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 69-80.
Maryati, I., & Monica, V. (2021). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Inkuiri dalam Kemampuan Representasi Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 333-344.
Menold, J., & Jablokow, K. (2019). Exploring the effects of cognitive style diversity and self-efficacy beliefs on final design attributes in student design teams. Design Studies, 60, 71-102.
Mulyo, M. R. G. T., Sari, A. F., & Syarifuddin, A. (2019). Proses Berpikir Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Visualizer dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah TIMSS Non Geometri. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 167-178.
Mustangin. (2015). Representasi Konsep dan Peranannya Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 15-21.
Ott, N., Brünken, R., Vogel, M., & Malone, S. (2018). Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. Learning and Instruction, 58, 88-105.
Pasehah, A. M., & Firmansyah, D. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Penyajian Data. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1d).
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (2018, October). Transfer and teaching thinking. In Thinking: The second international conference (pp. 285-303). Routledge.
Pratiwi, R. D. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Barisan dan Deret Aritmatika Kelas XI SMA NEGERI 1 WONOSARI GROBOGAN. Yogyakarta: Skripsi dipublikasikan.
Rahmatina, S., Sumarmo, U., & Johar, R. (2014). Tingkat berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(1).
Troussas, C., Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2021). Personalized tutoring through a stereotype student model incorporating a hybrid learning style instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2295-2307.
Sabirin, M. (2016). Representasi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal JPM IAIN Antasari, 2(1), 33-44.
Safaruddin, S., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyosari, P., & Murtadho, N. (2020). The Effect of PjBL with WBL Media and Cognitive Style on Students’ Understanding and Science-Integrated Concept Application. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 384-395.
Sanjaya, I. I., Maharani, H. R., & Basir, M. A. (2018). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Lingkaran Berdasar Gaya Belajar Honey Mumfrod. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 2(1), 72-87.
Sari, F. Y., Supriadi, N., & Putra, R. W. Y. (2022). Model Pembelajaran CUPs Berbantuan Media Handout: Dampak terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 95-106.
Septiani, D. (2020, May). Analyzing students’ representation ability: viewed from reflective-impulsive cognitive style. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1538, No. 1, p. 012105). IOP Publishing.
Silviani, E., Mardiani, D., & Sofyan, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Statistika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 483-492.
Sudiana, S., & Cintamulya, I. (2018). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa Bergaya Kognitif pada Pembelajaran Biologi melalui Model Pembelajaran Circuit Learning dengan Media Visual. Biogenesis, 14(2), 53-60.
Umah, U. (2020). Comparison of Students' Covariational Reasoning Based on Differences in Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Style. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 41-54.
Utomo, V. O. Y., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2017). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Gaya Kognitif Reflektif-Impulsif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open-Ended. KadikmA, 8(2), 125-134.
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1-16.
Wang, C., & Lu, H. (2018). Mediating effects of individuals’ ability levels on the relationship of Reflective-Impulsive cognitive style and item response time in CAT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 89-99.
Warli. (2009). Proses Berpikir Anak Reflektif atau Implusif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(2).
Yudhanegara, M. R., & Lestari, K. E. (2014). Meningkatkan kemampuan representasi beragam matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah terbuka. Majalah Ilmiah Solusi, 1(04).
Yulinawati, A., & Nuraeni, R. (2021). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis ditinjau dari Self-Confidence Siswa pada Materi Statistika di Desa Talagasari. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(3), 519-530.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
