The Secret to Effective Learning: The Magic of Formative Assessment in Mathematics Class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i3.2062Keywords:
Efektivitas, Matematika, Penilaian Formatif, Effectiveness, Mathematics, Formative AssessmentAbstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menentukan efektivitas penilaian formatif dalam pendidikan Matematika melalui metode tinjauan pustaka. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi literatur meliputi buku, tesis, disertasi, artikel, dan sumber lain yang relevan. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis integratif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penilaian formatif sangat penting karena memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang kekuatan dan kelemahan siswa dalam menguasai konsep-konsep matematika. Hal ini memungkinkan guru untuk melakukan penyesuaian strategi pengajaran secara real-time guna mendukung pemahaman siswa secara optimal. Dalam pendidikan Matematika, penilaian formatif diidentifikasi sebagai katalis yang sangat penting dalam menyediakan pengalaman belajar yang lebih mendalam dan bermakna bagi siswa. Penilaian formatif sangat efektif dalam pendidikan Matematika, membantu guru memahami sejauh mana siswa telah menguasai materi yang diajarkan, mengidentifikasi area yang memerlukan perbaikan, dan menyesuaikan pengajaran untuk memenuhi kebutuhan siswa. Selain itu, penilaian formatif lebih efektif dibandingkan penilaian sumatif dalam hal meningkatkan motivasi akademik, mengurangi kecemasan terhadap ujian, dan meningkatkan keterampilan regulasi diri.
Mathematics education through the literature review method. The research method used is literature study including books, theses, dissertations, articles and other relevant sources. Data were analyzed using integrative analysis techniques. The research results show that formative assessment is very important because it provides a deeper understanding of students' strengths and weaknesses in mastering mathematical concepts. This allows teachers to adjust teaching strategies in real-time to optimally support student understanding. In Mathematics education, formative assessment is identified as a very important catalyst in providing deeper and more meaningful learning experiences for students. Formative assessment is very effective in Mathematics education, helping teachers understand the extent to which students have mastered the material being taught, identify areas that need improvement, and adapt instruction to meet students' needs. In addition, formative assessment is more effective than summative assessment in terms of increasing academic motivation, reducing test anxiety, and improving self-regulation skills.
References
Alshurideh, M. T., al Kurdi, B., AlHamad, A. Q., Salloum, S. A., Alkurdi, S., Dehghan, A., Abuhashesh, M., & Masa’deh, R. (2021). Factors Affecting the Use of Smart Mobile Examination Platforms by Universities’ Postgraduate Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study. Informatics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020032
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing a Theory of Formative Assessment. Educational Assessment, 14(3), 116–132.
Black, Paul and Wiliam, Dylan (1998). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7—74.
Brown. M. & Harris, L. (2021). Inclusive education and Formative assessment Methods for classroom engagement. Journal of Inclusive Practices in Education, 153. p.58-72
Carney, E. A., Zhang, X., Charsha, A., Taylor, J. N., & Hoshaw, J. P. (2022). Formative Assessment Helps Students Learn over Time: Why Aren't We Paying More Attention to It?. Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning, 4(1), n1.
Green, J. (2021). Barriers to Formative Assessment in Resource-Limited Classrooms. Journal of Educational Assessment, 18(2), 78-89.
Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 217-231.
Handayani, U. F. (2024). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun datar ditinjau dari level van hiele. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 3(2), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i2.1731
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Ismail, S. M., et al. (2022). Formative vs. Summative Assessment: Impacts on Academic Motivation, Attitude Toward Learning, Test Anxiety, and Self-Regulation Skills. Language Testing in Asia. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
Jones, A. (2019). The Role of Technology in Formative Assessment. Educational Technology Review, 15(1), 22-31.
Jones, L, & Talwar, S. (2019). Effective use of Formative Assessment in Mathematics: Bridging Theory and practice. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(4), 22-35.
Kartiningrum, E. D. 2015. Panduan Penyusunan Studi Literatur. Mojokerto.
Kistler, R. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment in Mathematics Education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 45-59.
Kosasih, U., Saputra, S., & Mutmainnah, S. (2023). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Bernuansa Islami Terkait Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(3), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i3.1510
Kowalski, F.V dan Kowalski, S.E. 2011. Embedded Formative Assessment in the Undergraduate Engineering Classroom. Department of Physics Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO, USA.
Linden, J., Nieuwenhuis, L., Vleuten, C. V.., & Schlit-Mol, T. (2023). Formative Use of Assessment to Foster Self Regulated Learning: The Alignment of Teachers’ Conceptions and Classroom Assessment. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 7(4).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00082-8
Martin, P. P., & Graulich, N. (2023). When a machine detects student reasoning: a review of machine learning-based formative assessment of mechanistic reasoning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 407-427.
Miatun, A., & Ulfah, S. (2023). The Limited Face-To-Face Learning Implementation: Gender and Math Anxiety Towards Mathematical Conceptual Understanding. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(4), 895-908. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i4.1200
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292.
Noverli, M. F., Asih, E. C. M., & Juandi, D. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis peserta didik kelas viii penghafal al-qur’an pada materi peluang. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 3(2), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i2.1783
Patra, I., Alazemi, A., Al-Jamal, D., & Gheisari, A. (2022). The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL). Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 19.
Puteri, D., et al. (2021). The Effectiveness of Authentic Assessment in Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i1.3535
Rahayu, S., Cahyani, R. E., Herlina, Y., & Wahyuni, R. (2024). Analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem-solving abilities on matrix content. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 3(2), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i2.1478
Saepuloh, A. R., Luritawaty, I. P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2024). Assessing Mathematical Understanding in Fourth-Grade Students: A Focus on Multiplication and Division Skills. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(3), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i3.2210
Smith, J. (2020). Integrating Technology in Education: Enhancing Learning and Teaching through Innovative Practices. Educational Technology Research and Practice, 11(2), 34-47.
Smith, R. (2020). Teacher Training and Formative Assessment in Mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 124-136.
Stanja, J., Gritz, W., Krugel, J., Hoppe, A., & Dannemann, S. (2023). Formative assessment strategies for students' conceptions—The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 58-75.
Steen, J. et.al. (2023). Designing Formative Assessment That Improves Teaching and Learning: What Can Be Learned from the Design Stories of Experienced Teachers? Journal of Formative Design in Learning,7, 182-194.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w
Stiggins, R., Arter, J. A., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2004). Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well. USA.
Sudakova, N. E. et al. (2022). Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3).
https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci12030209
van der Linden, J., et al. (2023). Formative Use of Assessment to Foster Self-Regulated Learning: The Alignment of Teachers’ Conceptions and Classroom Assessment Practices. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 7, 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00082-8
Van der Steen, J., et al. (2023). Designing Formative Assessment That Improves Teaching and Learning: What Can Be Learned from the Design Stories of Experienced Teachers? Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w
Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers Developing Assessment for Learning: Impact on Student Achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
