Cognitive Conflict Strategy: Mathematical Representation Based on Cognitive Style
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.788Keywords:
Gaya kognitif, representasi matematis, strategi konflik kognitif, cognitive conflict strategies, cognitive style, mathematical representationAbstract
Kajian ini bermaksud untuk mendeskripsikan jenis representasi matematis siswa berdasarkan gaya kognitif dalam menyelesaikan masalah integral setelah diberikan pembelajaran strategi konflik kognitif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksploratif dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif-kualitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Halu Oleo angkatan tahun 2021 yang terdiri dari satu mahasiswa dengan gaya kognitif reflektif and satu mahasiswa dengan gaya kognitif impulsif. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui teknik pemberian tes and wawancara, and dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah siswa yang memiliki gaya kognitif reflektif dalam menyelesaikan masalah integral setelah diajarkan strategi konflik kognitif adalah melakukan representasi gambar atau representasi geometri, representasi verbal and representasi simbolik, serta melakukan penerjemahan dari berbagai jenis representasi, yaitu dari representasi geometri ke representasi verbal, and kemudian ke representasi simbolik serta sebaliknya. Seandgkan, siswa dengan gaya kognitif impulsif melakukaan representasi simbolik, melakukan representasi geometrik tetapi salah, tidak melakukan representasi verbal, tidak melakukan representasi matematis, and tidak melakukan penerjemahan dari berbagai jenis representasi.
This study aimed to describe types of students' mathematical representations based on the cognitive style in solving integral problems after learning cognitive conflict strategies. This exploratory research used a descriptive-qualitative approach. The participants were two students of Mathematics Education Department at Halu Oleo Universit, class of 202, consisting of one student with a reflective cognitive style and one student with an impulsive cognitive style. The research data were obtained through tests and interviews and analyzed qualitatively. The findings pointed out that the student with a reflective cognitive style performed images or geometric representations, verbal representations, and symbolic representations, as well as translated various types of representations, starting from geometric representations to verbal representations, and then to symbolic representation and vice versa. Meanwhile, the student with an impulsive cognitive style performed symbolic representations, inaccurate geometric representations, but lacked verbal representations, mathematical representations, and translation of various types of representation.
References
Aini, N., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2020). Exploring the combinatorial reasoning of high school students with reflective and impulsive cognitive style in solving problems. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.768023
Alalouch, C. (2021). Cognitive styles, gender, and student academic performance in engineering education. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090502
Astutik, E. P., & Purwasih, S. M. (2023). Field Dependent Student Errors in Solving Linear Algebra Problems Based on Newman's Procedure. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 169-180.
Chasanah, C., Riyadi, & Usodo, B. (2020). The effectiveness of learning models on written mathematical communication skills viewed from students’ cognitive styles. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.979
Chen, Y. T., Liou, S., & Chen, L. F. (2019). The Relationships among Gender, Cognitive Styles, Learning Strategies, and Learning Performance in the Flipped Classroom. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(4–5). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543082
Cintamulya, I. (2019). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles on conservation and environmental knowledge learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 20(1).
Fauzan, B. A., Kusnadi, D., & Sofyan, A. (2023). Changes in Students' Cognitive Abilities through STEM-Based Learning in Elementary Schools. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 89-100.
Guarana, C. L., & Hernandez, M. (2016). Identified ambivalence: When cognitive conflicts can help individuals overcome cognitive traps. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7). https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000105
Herianto. (2020). Matching Familiar Figures Tes (MFFT). 1–8. https://osf.io/34ut8
Ismaeel, D. A., & Mulhim, E. N. al. (2021). The influence of interactive and static infographics on the academic achievement of reflective and impulsive students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6138
Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2020). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In Computers As Cognitive Tools: Volume II, No More Walls. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315045337-8
Kamid, Rusdi, M., Fitaloka, O., Basuki, F. R., & Anwar, K. (2020). Mathematical communication skills based on cognitive styles and gender. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20497
Kokkonen, T., & Schalk, L. (2021). One Instructional Sequence Fits all? A Conceptual Analysis of the Applicability of Concreteness Fading in Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Education. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 33, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09581-7
Lai, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of mathematics anxiety and mathematical metacognition on word problem solving in children with and without mathematical learning difficulties. PLoS ONE, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130570
Lin, C. C., Huang, I., & Wu, S. H. (2018). Effects of Dietary Infographics and Cognitive Styles on Learners Information Processing. Proceedings - 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2018.00077
Linda, L., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Self-efficacy pada Materi Segiempat dan Segitiga di Desa Sirnajaya. Journal of Mathematics Science and Computer Education, 2(1), 20-43.
Maharani, I. P., & Subanji, S. (2018). Scaffolding Based on Cognitive Conflict in Correcting the Students’ Algebra Errors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2697
Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., & Puspitasari, R. (2020). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Conflict on Physics Learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06213
Muhtarom, Sugiyanti, Utami, R. E., & Indriana, K. (2018). Metacognitive ability of male students: Difference impulsive-reflective cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012118
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2020). Effectiveness of the implementation of cognitive conflict strategy assisted by e-service learning to reduce students’ mathematical misconceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.11802
Purnama, I. M. C. A., Suparta, I. N., & Ardana, I. M. (2021). Analysis of the Mathematical Problem-Solving Characteristics Based on Cognitive Style on Students in the VIII Grade. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(02). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.11787
Purwaningsih, W. I., Astuti, E. P., Nugraheni, P., & Rizkyaningtyas, N. P. (2019). Characteristics of intuitive thinking in solve mathematical issue based on cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012081
Rahim, R. A., Noor, N. M., & Zaid, N. M. (2015). Meta-analysis on element of cognitive conflict strategies with a focus on multimedia learning material development. International Education Studies, 13. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p73
Ramsburg, J. T., & Ohlsson, S. (2016). Category change in the absence of cognitive conflict. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000050
Rau, M. A., & Matthews, P. G. (2017). How to make ‘more’ better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance students’ learning about fractions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0846-8
Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.18592/jpm.v1i2.49
Sahendra, A., Budiarto, M. T., & Fuad, Y. (2018). Students’ Representation in Mathematical Word Problem-Solving: Exploring Students’ Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012059
Salam, M., Ibrahim, N., & Sukardjo, M. (2019). The Effect of Learning Model and Spatial Intelligence on Learning Outcome. https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.76
Sari, D. P., & Darhim. (2020). Implementation of react strategy to develop mathematical representation, reasoning, and disposition ability. In Journal on Mathematics Education (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.7806.145-156
Sarosa, S. (2021). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. In Rajawali Pers.
Shahbari, J. A., & Peled, I. (2015). Resolving Cognitive Conflict In A Realistic Situation With Modeling Characteristics: Coping With A Changing Reference In Fractions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9509-1
Shoimah, R. N., Lukito, A., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). The Creativity of Reflective and Impulsive Selected Students in Solving Geometric Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012023
Silviani, E., Mardiani, D., & Sofyan, D. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Statistika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 483-492.
Sudia, M., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2014). Profil Metakognisi Siswa Smp Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Terbuka. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20.
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
Sundayana, R., & Parani, C. E. (2023). Analyzing Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometric Problems Using Newman’s Procedure Based on Students’ Cognitive Style. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 135-144.
Taofik, A. I., & Juandi, D. (2022). Description of Mathematical Representation Ability Through HOTS-Oriented Learning Model: a Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Analisa, 8(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v8i1.17915
Yakubova, G., Hughes, E. M., & Baer, B. L. (2020). Supporting students with ASD in mathematics learning using video-based concrete-representational-abstract sequencing instruction. Preventing School Failure, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1627999
Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2022). Analysis of algebraic problems intended for elementary graders in Finland, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. Educational Studies, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1740977
Yarmohammadian, A. (2014). The Relationship between Spatial Awareness and Mathematic Disorders in Elementary School Students with Learning Mathematic Disorder. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140301.16
Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLoS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847
Yustinaningrum, B., & Lubis, N. A. (2019, June). Implementasi conceptual change teaching dalam mereduksi miskonsepsi mahasiswa materi induksi matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 39-49).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
