Examining The Correlation Between Teachers' Interaction to Student Error and The Development of Students' Mathematical Identities

Authors

  • Irwani Zawawi Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • Sri Suryanti Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Lestariningsih Lestariningsih Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i3.485

Keywords:

Mathematical identities of learners, students’ errors, interactions of teacher, identitas matematis siswa, kesalahan siswa, interaksi guru

Abstract

Komponen penting dari pengajaran matematika yang efektif adalah secara aktif mengatasi kesalahan siswa. Pendekatan pedagogis ini memainkan peran penting dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa. Studi ini menyelidiki cara guru di dua kelas mata pelajaran matematika sekolah menengah dalam memberikan kesempatan bagi siswa untuk mengembangkan identitas mereka, berdasarkan cara guru membahas dan terlibat dengan kesalahan siswa. Data dikumpulkan selama enam bulan melalui rekaman pembelajaran, catatan lapangan, dan wawancara dengan guru dan siswa. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dua perspektif tentang bagaimana guru menangani kesalahan: persepsi bahwa kesalahan dapat menyebar, dan persepsi bahwa kesalahan dapat berfungsi sebagai peluang belajar yang berharga. Pendekatan guru untuk membahas dan menangani kesalahan dipengaruhi oleh perspektif mereka tentang siswa dan pemikiran logis mereka dalam matematika, yang mempengaruhi identitas yang mereka tunjukkan kepada siswa. Kami menunjukkan bahwa persepsi siswa tentang metode pengolahan kesalahan oleh guru mereka mempengaruhi hubungan mereka dengan matematika. Namun, siswa itu sendiri juga berkontribusi pada pengembangan identitas matematika mereka.

Actively addressing student mistakes is an important component of effective mathematics instruction. This pedagogical approach plays an important role in increasing student involvement. The study investigates how teachers in two classes of high school mathematics subjects create opportunities for students to develop their identity as students based on how teaching discusses and engages with student mistakes. We collected the data over six months using learning recordings, field records, and interviews with both teachers and students. This research explores two perspectives on how teachers deal with mistakes: the view that mistakes can spread and the view that mistakes may serve as valuable learning opportunities. The perspectives of students and their logical thinking in mathematics influence the teacher's approach to discussing and dealing with errors, shaping the identity they portray to students. We showed that students' perceptions of the methods of processing their teacher's errors influenced their relationship with mathematics. However, the students themselves also contributed to the development of their mathematical identity.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2014). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 34, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.004

Brodie, K. (2014). Learning about learner errors in professional learning communities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 221–239.

Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467–498.

Dellantonio, S., & Pastore, L. (2021). Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking. Synthese, 198(8), 7473–7501.

Dorko, A. (2019). Generalization, assimilation, and accommodation. The Mathematics Educator, 28(2).

Gardee, A. (2021). Relationships between teachers’ practices and learners’ mathematical identities. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(3), 377–403.

Graven, M., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Mathematics identity research: the state of the art and future directions: Review and introduction to ZDM Special Issue on Identity in Mathematics Education. ZDM, 51(3), 361–377.

Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2015). Opportunities for learning given to prospective mathematics teachers: Between ritual and explorative instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(9), 547–574.

Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30.

Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2018). The social life of mathematical learning: Exploring identity, participation, and meaning in school mathematics practices. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403543

Löwstedt, M., & Räisänen, C. (2014). Social identity in construction: enactments and outcomes. Construction Management and Economics, 32(11), 1093–1105.

Marks, A., & O’mahoney, J. (2014). Researching identity: A critical realist approach. In P. K. Edwards, J. O’mahoney, & S. Vincent (Eds.), Studying organizations using critical realism: A practical guide (pp. 66–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 420–446.

Paul, E. (2022). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 460.

Radatz, H. (1980). Students’ errors in the mathematical learning process: a survey. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 16–20.

Radovic, D., Black, L., Williams, J., & Salas, C. E. (2019). Towards conceptual coherence in the research on mathematics learner identity: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 21–42.

Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54.

Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1–12.

Santagata, R. (2005). Practices and beliefs in mistake-handling activities: A video study of Italian and US mathematics lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.004

Sarwadi, H. R. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding students’ mathematical errors and misconceptions: The case of year 11 repeating students. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2(1), 1–10.

Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.

Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 147–165). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Irwani Zawawi, Suryanti, S., & Lestariningsih, L. (2024). Examining The Correlation Between Teachers’ Interaction to Student Error and The Development of Students’ Mathematical Identities. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(3), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i3.485

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.