Meta-Analysis of TPACK Research on Mathematics Education

Authors

  • Yullys Helsa Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Sartono Sartono Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Bayu Ramadhani Fajri Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Wiki Lofandri Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Desmaiyanti Desmaiyanti Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i2.1674

Keywords:

TPACK, Pendidikan Matematika, ukuran efek, Mathematics Education, effect size

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh Pengetahuan Konten Pedagogis Teknologi (TPACK) terhadap kemampuan matematika calon guru dalam mengajar matematika. Desain penelitian adalah tinjauan pustaka, dan subjek yang disertakan adalah penelitian yang tersedia dari situs web jurnal daring. Subjek penelitian dipilih berdasarkan kriteria inklusi penelitian, dan sebagai hasilnya, enam artikel dipilih untuk analisis TPACK terhadap kemampuan matematika. Data dianalisis dalam meta-analisis berdasarkan ukuran efek. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa TPACK memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap kemampuan matematika calon guru sebagaimana ditunjukkan dari ukuran efek rata-rata sebesar 1,06. Hasil tersebut juga menunjukkan bahwa efek keseluruhan TPACK terhadap kemampuan matematika adalah 1,06 dan dapat diklasifikasikan sebagai efek yang tinggi.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) on the pre-service teachers' mathematical ability to teach mathematics. The research design is a literature review, and the subject included is research available from online journal websites. The research subject was selected based on the research inclusion criteria, and as a result, six articles were selected for the analysis of TPACK on mathematical ability. Data were analyzed in a meta-analysis based on the effect size. The findings suggested that TPACK has a significant impact on the pre-service teachers' mathematical ability as shown from the mean effect size of 1.06. The results also indicated that the overall effect of TPACK on mathematical ability is 1.06 and can be classified as a high effect.

References

Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An Investigation of the Relationship between Self-Efficacy Beliefs about Technology Integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Preservice Teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143.

Adelabu, F. M., Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, M. S. (2019). The Importance of Dynamic Geometry Computer Software on Learners’ Performance in Geometry. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(1), 52–63.

Afriansyah, E. A., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Prospective teachers’ thinking through realistic mathematics education based emergent modeling in fractions. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 605-618.

Akkaya, R. (2016). Research on the Development of Middle School Mathematics Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding the Use of Technology in Teaching Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1257a

Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2017). Exploring in- and pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): What next? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6113–6131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01053a

Ariani, Y., Helsa, Y., Ahmad, S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Edmodo social learning network for elementary school mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012056

Arwadi, F., Haris, H., Akbar, M., Afriansyah, E. A., & Zaki, A. (2024). Kemampuan TPACK Mahasiswa PPL Program Studi PPG Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Negeri Makassar. Issues in Mathematics Educations, 8(2), 167-172.

Bozkurt, A. (2011). A classroom observation-based evaluation of elementary teachers’ use of technology in the classrooms in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(4), 367–373.

Busnawir, Aryanti, M., Sumarna, N., Kodirun, & Samparadja, H. (2023). TPACK Abilities of Mathematics Teachers: A Review Based on Teacher Certification and School Accreditation Status. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i3.831

Chen, C.-H., Shih, C.-C., & Law, V. (2020). The effecs of competition in digital game-based learning (DGBL): a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09794-1

Dede, C. (2009). Comparing Frameworks for “21st Century Skills.” 1–16.

Demİr, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2011). Primary Mathematics Teachers’ Views about Their Competencies Concerning the Integration of Technology. Elementary Education Online, 10(3), 850–860.

Demiraslan, Y., & Usluel, K. K. (2008). ICT integration processes in Turkish schools: Using activity theory to study issues and contradictions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1204

Demirtaş, B., & Mumcu, F. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of ICT and TPACK competencies. Acta Educationis Generalis, 11(2), 60-82.

Dijk, J. Van, & Hacker, K. (2003). The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. 19, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240390227895

Durusoy, O., & Kamarete, A. (2018). The Effect of Instructional Material Design Process to Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ TPACK. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(5), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1222082

Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00559.x

Friesen, S., & Lock, J. V. (2010). High Performing Districts in the Application of 21st Century LearningTechnologies: Review of the Research.

Fullan, M. (2013). The New Pedagogy: Students and Teachers as Learning Partners. LEARNing Landscapes, 6(2), 23–29.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. Pearson.

Gardner, H. (2006). Five Minds for The Future. Harvard Business School Press.

Handoko, H., & Winarno. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika melalui Pendekatan Scaffolding Berbasis Karakter. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.577

Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). Psychological Perspectives on Emerging Instructional Technologies: A Critical Analysis. 26(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2601_5

Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). Problem-Based Learning for Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48(2), 133–144.

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Onchwari, J. (2009). Technology and Student Learning: Toward a Learner- Centered Teaching Model. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 17(1), 11–22.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? the development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issue in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 66.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012

Meng, C. C., & Sam, L. C. (2013). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics with the Geometer’s Sketchpad through Lesson Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n1p1

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006

Nuraeni, R., & Juandi, D. (2023). Assessing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Proficiency Among Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Micro-Learning Courses. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(4), 843-852. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i4.1196

Nuraeni, R., Nurjanah, & Siregar, H. M. (2024). Eksplorasi Pembelajaran Kalkulus Integral dengan Menggunakan Teknologi. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i1.1526

Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4

Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153

Pink, D. H. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-brainers Will Rule the Future. Riverhead Books.

Pramasdyasari, A. S., Aini, S. N., & Setyawati, R. D. (2024). Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills through Ethnomathematics Digital Book STEM-PjBL. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i1.1979

Rahayu, M., Aima, Z., & Juwita, R. (2023). Validitas E-Modul Berbasis Android Menggunakan Sigil Software pada Materi Peluang. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 265-276. ttps://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i2.1342

Restiana, N., & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Pengukuran Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge untuk Guru Matematika SMA di Daerah Tertinggal. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i1.537

Saputro, T. V. D., Purnasari, P. D., Lumbantobing, W. L., & Sadewo, Y. D. (2024). Augmented Reality for Mathematics Learning: Could We Implement It in Elementary School?. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i1.1984

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology (pp. 97–118).

Suparman, Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). Review of problem-based learning trends in 2010-2020: A meta-analysis study of the effect of problem-based learning in enhancing mathematical problem-solving skills of Indonesian students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012103

Tamur, M., Ksumah, Y. S., Juandi, D., Kurnila, V. S., Jehadus, E., & Samura, A. O. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Past Decade of Mathematics Learning Based on the Computer Algebra System (CAS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012060

Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology. Work Learning Recearch, 1–9.

Thohir, M. A., Jumadi, J., & Warsono, W. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service science teachers: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 127-142.

Toheri, Kismeina, A., & Persada, A. R. (2022). Keterampilan guru matematika Se-Kabupaten Kuningan dalam pemanfaatan platform pembelajaran online masa pandemic. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i2.719

Tseng, J. J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948-971.

Wilson, D. B., Gottfredson, D. C., & Najaka, S. S. (2001). School-Based Prevention of Problem Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(3), 247–272.

Yildirim, B., & Sidekli, S. (2018). STEM applications in mathematics education: The effect of STEM applications on different dependent variables. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.200

Zainil, M., Prahmana, R. C. I., Helsa, Y., & Hendri, S. (2017). ICT media design for higher grade of elementary school mathematics learning using CS6 program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012046

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Helsa, Y., Sartono, S., Fajri, B. R., Lofandri, W., & Desmaiyanti, D. (2024). Meta-Analysis of TPACK Research on Mathematics Education. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i2.1674

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.