Analysis of Mathematical Logic and Computational Thinking Abilities of Informatics Engineering Students on Learning Achievement in Calculus Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i4.1787Keywords:
computational thinking, mathematical logic, calculus learning achievements, kemampuan berpikir komputasi, logika matematika, prestasi belajar kalkulusAbstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji hubungan antara kemampuan logika matematika dan berpikir komputasional dengan prestasi belajar mahasiswa dalam mata kuliah Kalkulus. Studi ini melibatkan 66 siswa semester pertama Program Studi Teknik Informatika pada tahun akademik 2022/2023. Tes untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir logika dan komputasional serta instruksi untuk mengumpulkan data tentang prestasi belajar adalah bagian dari metode pengumpulan data. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan korelasi Pearson bivariat dan regresi linear berganda, dengan pengujian prasyarat yang mencakup uji normalitas, homoskedastisitas, multikolinearitas, dan autokorelasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara berpikir komputasional dengan prestasi belajar (r = 0,715), antara logika matematika dengan prestasi belajar (r = 0,781), serta antara berpikir komputasional dan logika matematika (r = 0,661). Temuan ini mengindikasikan pentingnya integrasi kemampuan logika matematika dan berpikir komputasional dalam proses pembelajaran Kalkulus, yang dapat diupayakan melalui pendekatan pedagogis yang tepat serta pengembangan media pembelajaran yang mendukung.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the relationship between mathematical logic skills and computational thinking with students' academic performance in the Calculus course. This study involved 66 first-semester students of the Computer Engineering Study Program in the 2022/2023 academic year. Tests to measure logical and computational thinking abilities, as well as instructions for collecting data on learning achievements, are part of the data collection methods. Data analysis was conducted using bivariate Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression, with prerequisite tests including normality, homoscedasticity, multicollinearity, and autocorrelation tests. The analysis results show a significant relationship between computational thinking and academic achievement (r = 0.715), between mathematical logic and academic achievement (r = 0.781), as well as between computational thinking and mathematical logic (r = 0.661). These findings indicate the importance of integrating mathematical logic skills and computational thinking in the learning process of Calculus, which can be pursued through appropriate pedagogical approaches and the development of supportive learning media.
References
Angraini, L. M., Arcat, A., & Sohibun, S. (2022). Pengaruh Bahan Ajar Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif terhadap Kemampuan Computational Thinking Matematis Mahasiswa. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(2), 370. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i2.6937
Azinar, J. A., Munzir, S., & Bahrun. (2020). Students’ logical-mathematical intelligence through the problem-solving approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012024
Boom, K. D., Bower, M., Arguel, A., Siemon, J., & Scholkmann, A. (2018). Relationship between computational thinking and a measure of intelligence as a general problem-solving ability. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197104
Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W. M., Howe, C., & Lister, R. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
Candraningtyas, S. R., & Khusna, H. (2023). Computational thinking ability becomes a predictor of mathematical critical thinking ability. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2023.v5i2.247-263
Christi, S. R. N., & Rajiman, W. (2023). Pentingnya Berpikir Komputasional dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Journal on Education, 5(4), 12590–12598. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2246
Devianti, A. (2013). Panduan Lengkap Mencerdaskan Otak Anak Usia 1-6 Tahun. Araska.
Fatimah, S., Johar, R., & Zubainur, C. M. (2020). Students’ logical mathematical intelligence in completing mathematical problems with natural disaster context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012022
Guggemos, J. (2021). On the predictors of computational thinking and its growth at the high-school level. Computers and Education, 161(March 2020), 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104060
Litia, N., Sinaga, B., & Mulyono, M. (2023). Profil Berpikir Komputasi Siswa dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar di SMA N 1 Langsa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1508–1518. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2270
Megawati, A. T., Sholihah, M., & Kintan Limiansih. (2023). Implementasi Computational Thinking dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Review Pendidikan, 9(2).
Mohammed, F. R. (2023). The mediating role of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between computational thinking and design thinking among students at the college of information technology. Journal of Social and Educational Research, 2(2), 61–67.
Morris, E. (2023). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315175386
Nursiyono, J. A., & Nadeak, P. P. H. (2016). Setetes Imu Regresi Linear. Media Nusa Creative.
Özgür, H. (2020). Relationships between computational thinking skills, ways of thinking and demographic variables: A structural equation modeling. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i2.862
Paf, M., & Dinçer, B. (2021). A Study of the Relationship between Secondary School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills and Creative Problem-Solving Skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 1–15.
Quadratullah, M. . (2014). Statistika Terapan: Teori, Contoh Kasus, dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. ANDI OFFSET.
Revika, S. P., Yahfizham, Y., William Iskandar Ps, J. V, Estate, M., Percut Sei Tuan, K., & Deli Serdang, K. (2024). Studi Literatur Analisis Algoritma Pemrograman Pengaruh Computational Thinking pada Pembelajaran Matematika. SABER: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, Sains Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.59841/saber.v2i1.606
Risnandar, & Al Maki, W. F. (2022). Metode Computational Thinking Untuk Pengabdian Masyarakat Dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Bahasa Pemrograman Python Siswa Smk (Studi Kasus: Smk Asshiddiqiyah Karangpawitan, Garut) Computational Thinking Method for the Community Service in Improving Python Pro. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Teknologi Informasi Dan Informatika (DIMASLOKA), 1(1), 1–7.
Senouci, B., & Nacera, B. (2022). Level of logical-mathematical intelligence among middle school students. Journal of Legal and Social Studies, 7(2), 36–59.
Swaid, S. I. (2015). Bringing Computational Thinking to STEM Education. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 3657–3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.761
Syarifuddin, M., Risa, D. F., Hanifah, A. I., & Nurussa’adah. (2016). Experiment computational thinking : upaya meningkatkan kualitas problem solving anak melalui permainan gorlids. 3(6), 1–15.
Wanti, S., & Aprianti, E. (2018). Peningkatan Kecerdasan Logika- Dini Kelompok a Di Kober Warna Plus. Jurnal Ceria, 1(4), 8.
Zulfairanatama, G., & Hadi, S. (2013). Kercerdasan Logika Matematika Berdasarkan Multiple Intelligences Terhadap Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMP di Banjarmasin. EDU-MAT Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 18–26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
