Mathematical Knowledge Content in Junior High School Curriculum: A Comparative Study of the 2013 Curriculum and Merdeka Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.795Keywords:
Konten Pengetahuan Matematika, SMP, Kurikulum Merdeka, Kurikulum 2013, Mathematical Knowledge Content, Junior High School, Merdeka Curriculum, 2013 CurriculumAbstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi materi matematika SMP pada kurikulum Merdeka, dan untuk mengetahui perbedaan materi matematika pada kurikulum Merdeka dan kurikulum 2013. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan tinjauan pustaka secara sistematik. Hal ini karena digunakan sebagai studi pengembangan awal yang dilakukan untuk penyusunan LKS. Sesuai dengan metode penelitian yang digunakan, peneliti menjadi instrumen utama. Langkah-langkah penelitian ini adalah (1) merumuskan pertanyaan tinjauan, (2) melakukan pencarian literatur secara sistematis, (3) menyaring dan memilih artikel penelitian yang sesuai, (4) menganalisis dan menyintesis temuan kualitatif, (5) menjaga kendali mutu, dan (6) menyajikan temuan. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari regulasi kurikulum merdeka, regulasi kurikulum 2013, dan mengidentifikasi artikel dari jurnal. Teknik analisis data mengacu pada reduksi data, display data dan verifikasi data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa materi matematika yang dipelajari siswa pada kurikulum Merdeka sebagian besar sama dengan kurikulum 2013, namun terdapat perbedaan pada materi lingkaran. Untuk materi himpunan, dan aritmetika sosial belum dipelajari dalam kurikulum merdeka.
This study aimed to identify junior high school mathematics material in the Merdeka curriculum and to find out the differences in mathematics material in the Merdeka curriculum and the 2013 curriculum. The research method used in this study was qualitative with a systematic literature review approach because it served as a preliminary development analysis carried out to prepare worksheets. According to the research method used, the researcher becomes the main instrument. The steps of this research are (1) formulating the review question, (2) conducting a systematic literature search, (3) screening and selecting appropriate research articles, (4) analyzing and synthesizing qualitative findings, (5) maintaining quality control, and (6) presenting finding. The Merdeka curriculum's regulation provided the data for this study, 2013 curriculum regulation, and identifying articles from journals. Data analysis techniques refer to data reduction, display, and verification. The results show that the mathematics material that students learn in the Merdeka curriculum is mostly the same as the 2013 curriculum, but there are differences in the circle material. The Merdeka curriculum excludes the study of set content and social math.
References
Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The impact of covid-19 on indonesian education and its relation to the philosophy of “merdeka belajar.” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38–49.
Ahmad, D. (2014). Understanding the 2013 curriculum of English teaching through the teachers’ and policymakers’ perspectives. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development (IJERED), 2(4), 6–15.
Alfauzan, A. A. H., & Tarchouna, N. (2017). The role of an aligned curriculum design in the achievement of learning outcomes. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 4(3), 81–91.
Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Eprijum, D., Pratiwi, I., Utama, B., Alhapip, L., & Widiaswati, D. (2022). Kajian akademik kurikulum untuk pemulihan pembelajaran.
Annisa, N., Nurfadilah, A., & Maharani, C. (2022). Kesiapan Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Prototipe Untuk Menciptakan Generasi Yang Kreatif dan Inovatif. Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(2), 175–184.
Azevedo, A., Apfelthaler, G., & Hurst, D. (2012). Competency development in business graduates: An industry-driven approach for examining the alignment of undergraduate business education with industry requirements. International Journal of Management Education, 10(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.02.002
Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Gorbacheva, E., Miskon, S., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015). Achieving rigor in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 8.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. I. (2013). Changing problem-based learning. In The challenge of problem-based learning (pp. 9–22). Routledge.
Chandrasari Desianti, L., & Rahayuningsih, T. (2022). Sekolah Penggerak and Guru Penggerak Evaluation Policy as Pioneers of Changes in The Education System in The New Paradigm Curriculum. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 128–140.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Dewi, M. P., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2021). Distance learning policy during pandemic COVID-19. EDUTEC: Journal of Education and Technology, 4(3), 325–333.
Dewi, R. P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Aplikasi Google Classroom pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 39-52.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22.
Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementrian Riset, Teknologi, dan P. T. R. I. (2015). Paradigma Capaian Pembelajaran.
Effendi, M. M., Ummah, S. K., & Cahyono, H. (2023). Teacher Perspective and Performance in Curriculum Prototype Implementation through the Development of Innovative Project-Based Learning Modules. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 47-58.
Fatmawati, E. (2021). Kebijakan Kurikulum di Masa Pandemi. MATAAZIR: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 158–173.
Francis-Baldesari, C. (2006). Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature.
Hadiyanto, H., Noferdiman, N., Syamsurizal, S., Muhaimin, M., & Krisantia, I. (2021). Students’ soft skills, hard skills, and competitiveness (SHC): A suggested model for Indonesian higher education curriculum. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 218–234.
Hartati, L. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Integral dengan Strategi Small Group Discussion. Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1).
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553.
Hung, M. L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 81, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
Julaeha, S. (2019). Problematika kurikulum dan pembelajaran pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 157.
Kartika, A., Kismartini, K., & Rahman, A. Z. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Kuliah Daring di Universitas Diponegoro. Journal Of Public Policy And Management Review, 10(4), 79–98.
Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementrian pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi No 008/H/KR/2022 Tentang Capaian pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Meneng, Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (2022).
Lahti, R. (2013). Does Attainment Of Piaget’s Formal Operational Level Of Cognitive Development Predict Student Understanding Of Scientific Models? In Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. University of Montana.
Li, Y., Zhang, X., Dai, D. Y., & Hu, W. (2021). Curriculum innovation in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: the thinking-based instruction theory and its application. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 601607.
Lubben, F., Braund, M., Koopman, R., Scholtz, Z., & November, I. (2014). The Piaget theory of cognitive development: An educational implications. Educational Psychology, 1(1), 9.
Machali, I. (2014). Kebijakan perubahan kurikulum 2013 dalam menyongsong Indonesia emas tahun 2045. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 71–94.
Meda, L., & Swart, A. J. (2018). Analysing learning outcomes in an Electrical Engineering curriculum using illustrative verbs derived from Bloom’s Taxonomy. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 399–412.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
Muhammedi, M. (2016). Perubahan Kurikulum Di Indonesia: Studi kritis tentang upaya menemukan Kurikulum Pendidikan islam yang ideal. Jurnal Raudhah, 4(1).
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2015). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. In IEA. TIMSS & PIRLS.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS Advanced 2015 International Results in Advanced Mathematics and Physics. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2018). TIMSS. In TIMSS 2015 International Result in Mathematics. IEA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n704
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report. In IEA. Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Sainsbury, M. (2015). PIRLS 2016 Assessment framework. In PIRLS 2016 Assessment Framework.
Munaji, M., & Setiawahyu, M. I. (2020). Profil kemampuan matematika siswa smp di kota cirebon berdasarkan standar timss. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 249–262.
Murtiyasa, B. (2015). Tantangan pembelajaran matematika era global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UMS 2015.
Nurfadhillah, S., Fazriandina, A., Hidayah, A., Yolawati, N. N., Maghfiroh, N., Arlita, N. D., & Dewanti, R. R. (2021). Analisis Mekanisme Kurikulum dan Evaluasi (Aphasia) serta (Diskalkulia) pada Siswa Kelas 1 SDN Sukasari 5 Kota Tangerang. ANWARUL, 1(1), 153–166.
Nurhasanah, A., Syafari, R., & Nurfaidah, A. R. (2022). Kesesuaian Buku Teks Matematika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 227-236.
Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development to Mathematics Instruction. The Mathematics Educators, 18(1), 26–30.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
Paré, G., & Kitsiou, S. (2017). Methods for literature reviews. In Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach [Internet]. University of Victoria.
Perdana, D. I. (2013). Kurikulum dan Pendidikan di Indonesia: Proses Mencari Arah Pendidikan yang Ideal di Indonesia atau Hegemoni Kepentingan Penguasa Semata? Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 2(1).
Rachmawati, N., Marini, A., Nafiah, M., & Nurasiah, I. (2022). Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Impelementasi Kurikulum Prototipe di Sekolah Penggerak Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3613–3625.
Rao, N. J. (2020). Outcome-based education: An outline. Higher Education for the Future, 7(1), 5–21.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. Relc Journal, 44(1), 5–33.
Ritonga, M. (2018). Politik dan Dinamika Kebijakan Perubahan Kurikulum Pendidikan di Indonesia Hingga Masa Reformasi. Bina Gogik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(2).
Rizti, T. M., & Prihatnani, E. (2021). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningfull) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 213-224.
Sadewa, M. A. (2022). Meninjau Kurikulum Prototipe Melalui Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi Prof M Amin Abdullah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(1), 266–280.
Sadiah, D. S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2023). Miskonsepsi siswa ditinjau dari tingkat penyelesaian masalah pada materi operasi pecahan. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 31-44.
Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Sims, M. H. (2013). Course goals, competencies, and instructional objectives. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 40(2), 139–144.
Sembiring, R. K. B. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Mata Kuliah Analisis Kompleks. Jurnal Ilmiah MBP, 5(2), II–69.
Setiawan, A., & Basyari, I. W. (2017). Desain Bahan Ajar yang Berorientasi pada Model Pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Division untuk Capaian Pembelajaran pada Ranah Pemahaman Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Plered Kabupaten Cirebon. Edunomic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ekonomi Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 17–32.
Shodikin, A. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Kalkulus Integral Berbasis Animasi. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–11.
Sholikhah, M., & Hartono. (2015). Perbandingan keefektifan antara problem- based learning seting numbered head together dan setting jigsaw. Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(November), 162–174.
Sihombing, A. A., Anugrahsari, S., Parlina, N., & Kusumastuti, Y. S. (2021). “ Merdeka Belajar” in an Online Learning during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Concept and Implementation. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 35–45.
Solikhah, P. I., & Purnomo, P. (2022). The Opportunity and Challenges of Implementing a Prototype Curriculum. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 407–421.
Soraya, E., & Lutfiati, A. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi literasi keuangan. Kinerja, 2(02), 111–134.
Syaputra, A., Hidayati, D., & Hasanah, E. (2023). Mathematics Curriculum Management of Distance Learning Program in Junior High School. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 71-80.
Tam, M. (2014). Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(2), 158–168.
Tasman, F., & Ahmad, D. (2017). Pemahaman mahasiswa terhadap integral sebagai anti turunan, suatu desain riset pada kalkulus integral. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 1(1), 9–16.
Tedjokoesoemo, P. E. D., Nilasari, P. F., & Sari, S. M. (2021). Addressing The Independent Learning Curriculum (Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar) as a Form of Positive Disruption to Empower the Community. Petra Christian University.
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 6.
Ulkhaq, M. M. (2023). Determinan pencapaian siswa bidang matematika: Perbandingan antara indonesia dan singapura. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 9-16.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413.
Wahyudi, W., & Suyitno, H. (2018). Dampak Perubahan Paradigma Baru Matematika Terhadap Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika di Indonesia. INOPENDAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(1).
Wahyuni, A. (2017). Analisis Hambatan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Dasar. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v1i1.253
Widodo, S. A. (2020). Pengembangan Mathematical Comic Untuk Pencapaian Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dan Konfirmasi Norma Sosiomatematika (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Widodo, S. A., Turmudi, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). An Error Students In Mathematical Problems Solves Based On Cognitive Development. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(07), 433–439. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/july2019/An-Error-Students-In-Mathematical-Problems-Solves-Based-On-Cognitive-Development.pdf
Widodo, S. A., Turmudi, T., Dahlan, J. A., Istiqomah, I., & Saputro, H. (2018). Mathematical Comic Media for Problem Solving Skills. International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation, 101–108.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2017). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In The future of assessment (pp. 53–82). Routledge.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
Yonafri, C., & Gani, E. (2021). The Effectiveness of Online Learning on the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum. Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA 2020), 246–250.
Zahro, I. F., & Aprianti, E. (2022). Penyuluhan Literasi Anak Usia Dini sebagai Pembelajaran Abad 21 pada Guru PAUD di Desa Paas Kabupaten Garut. Nusantara Berdaya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 1–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
