Identifying Students’ Numeracy Skills through Realistic Mathematics Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v5i1.2553Keywords:
Numerasi, PMRI, AKM, Tingkat kompetensi numerasi, numeracy, level of numeracy competenceAbstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan tingkatan kemampuan numerasi siswa yang menggunakan pendekatan PMRI dalam pembelajarannya. Penelitian ini dilakukan selain karena adanya masalah mendasar dalam literasi matematika siswa dan masih sedikitnya penelitian mengenai pendekatan pembelajaran yang efektif untuk mengembangkan numerasi siswa, keterampilan ini adalah bekal siswa dalam kehidupan untuk dapat menggunakan matematika dalam berbagai konteks kehidupan nyata untuk pengambilan keputusan dan pemecahan masalah. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan subjek penelitian adalah 18 orang siswa kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah di Yogyakarta. Data yang dikumpulkan dalam penelitian ini berupa hasil observasi, hasil wawancara, catatan lapangan, dan dokumen hasil pekerjaan siswa. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan numerasi siswa berada pada level perlu intervensi khusus, dasar, dan cakap. Beberapa faktor yang menjadi penghambat dalam pelaksanaan penelitian di antaranya siswa belum terbiasa dengan pendekatan PMRI dalam kegiatan pembelajaran dan minimnya pengalaman siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal numerasi atau masalah matematika yang memiliki konteks atau situasi yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan.
The aim of this present study is to describe students’ level of numeracy competence using PMRI approach in learning mathematics. This research is conducted not only because og the fundamental issues in students’ mathematical literacy and the lack of studies on effective learning approaches to develop students’ numeracy, but also because these skills are essential for students in life to use mathematics in various real-life contexts for decision-making and problem-solving. This study is a qualitative descriptive which involved 18 Vocational School students grade X in Yogyakarta. Data collection in this research consisted of observation result, interview results, field notes, and students’ works. The analysis techniques used in this research are data reduction, data presentation, and drawing inferences and verification. The study showed that students’ level of numeracy competence was in the level of need for specific intervention, elementary, and capable. Several factors that inhibited the impelementation of research included students not being accustomed to the PMRI approach in learning and students’ lack of experiences in solving numeracy problems or mathematical problems that have a context or situation related to daily life.
References
Afriansyah, E. A., & Arwadi, F. (2021). Learning Trajectory of Quadrilateral Applying Realistic Mathematics Education: Origami-Based Tasks. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(4), 42-78.
Afriansyah, E. A., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Prospective teachers’ thinking through realistic mathematics education based emergent modeling in fractions. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 605-618.
Ain, S. Q., Mustika, D., & Wulandari, A. (2023). Permasalahan Pembelajaran Literasi Numerasi dan Karakter untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Aulad: Journal on Early Childhood, 6(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v6i2.452
Ares, N., & Evans, D. M. (2014). Mathematics and Numeracy as Social and Spatial Practice. Education Research International, 2014, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/742197
Arora, A., & Pawlowski, E. (2017). Examining Gender Differences in the Mathematical Literacy of 15-Year-Olds and the Numeracy Skills of the Age Cohorts as Adults. Commissioned Paper, 1–30. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/588a18c13a04118a0c68116e/1485445313820/Arora_Pawlowski_PIAAC_2017.pdf
Bansilal, S. (2016). Exploring the notion of Mathematical Literacy teacher knowledge. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(4), 1156–1172. https://doi.org/10.20853/28-4-388
Bennison, A. (2016). A sociocultural approach to understanding identity as an embedder-of-numeracy: A case of numeracy and history. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116643327
Bolstad, O. H. (2020). Secondary teachers’ operationalisation of mathematical literacy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9551
Caponera, E., Sestito, P., & Russo, P. M. (2016). The influence of reading literacy on mathematics and science achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.936998
Coben, D., & Research, N. (2001). What is specific about research in adult numeracy and mathematics? Development, DfEE, 18–32.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Doorman, M. (2002). How to guide students ? A reinvention course on modeling motion. Proceedings of 2001 The Netherlands and Taiwan Con- Ference on Mathematics Education, 97–114. http://www.fi.uu.nl/~michiel/proo/docs/doorman.pdf
Fauzan, A., & Diana, F. (2020). Learning trajectory for teaching number patterns using RME approach in junior high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012019
Gravemeijer, K., Fauzan, A., & Plomp, T. (2013). The development of an rme-based geometry course for Indonesian primary schools. Educational Design Research – Part B: Illustrative Cases, 2013, 159–178. https://research.tue.nl/files/3900348/23590380570408.pdf
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2024. https://data.dikdasmen.go.id/publikasi/p/rapor-pendidikan-indonesia/rapor-pendidikan-indonesia-2024
Kusuma, U. J., & Sagita, L. (2024). Pengembangan e-lkpd pendekatan pmri pada kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik kelas vii. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 3(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i1.1522
Lestari, L., Maryati, I., Sundayana, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Kajian literatur: Implementasi Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) pada kemampuan representasi matematis. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 58-70.
Malasari, P. N., Herman, T., & Jupri, A. (2020). Inquiry Co-Operation Model: An Effort to Enhance Students’ Mathematical Literacy Proficiency. JTAM | Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika, 4(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1894
Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D., & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of Research Design and Methodology (A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (eds.)). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-69-4-673
Meilina, A., Mariana, N., & Rahmawati, I. (2023). Implementasi lkpd pmri dalam materi membilang sampai 20 untuk siswa fase a sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v2i1.1398
Musliana, R., Hulpiana, T., Putri, D., Awinda, S., Rahmania, L. A., & Nurmawanti, I. (2024). Etnomatematika Historical Building “Taman Mayura” dan Implementasinya dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i2.1467
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Nurhanurawati, N., Caswita, C., Bharata, H., & Widyastuti, W. (2022). The analysis of junior high school students’ mathematical literacy: Field study in Bandar Lampung. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.11659
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. In PISA (Vol. 2). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-ii_b5fd1b8f-en
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Kemendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan KebudayaanPembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.
Rizkianto, I., Sarumaha, Y. A., & Putra, A. P. (2025). Pelatihan Penulisan Soal Literasi dan Numerasi bagi Guru. 2(1), 11–18.
Sari, A. F., & Aini, I. N. (2022). Analisis Literasi Numerasi Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pola Bilangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 11963–11969. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/4350
Sarumaha, Y. A. (2016). Perubahan Pembelajaran yang Berpusat pada Guru ke Berpusat pada Siswa. Intersections, 1(1), 1–10.
Sarumaha, Y. A., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2018). Percentage Bar: A Model for Helping Fifth Grade Students Understand Percentages. Mosharafa, 7(2), 155–166.
Sarumaha, Y. A., & Rizkianto, I. (2022). Promoting Mathematical Justification Through. JUPITEK; Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 83–94.
Sarumaha, Y. A., & Rizkianto, I. (2025). Perancangan Soal Literasi Numerasi: Komponen dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Guru. 6(1), 471–481.
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.
Siregar, R., Siagian, M. D., & Syahlan, S. (2024). Empowering Primary School Students Through Problem-Based Learning: A Path to Literacy and Numeracy Mastery. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(4), 975-988. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i4.2550
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., & Thanh, L. N. P. (2021). The effectiveness of applying realistic mathematics education approach in teaching statistics in grade 7 to students’ mathematical skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.82.185.197
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The Didactical Use of Models in Realistic Mathematics Education: An Example from A Longitudinal Trajectory on Percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 9–35. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.143.1.379
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 521–525). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8.
Van Eerde, H. A. A., Hajer, M., & Prenger, J. (2008). Promoting mathematics and language learning in interaction. In Interaction in two multicultural mathematics classrooms. Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion (In J.Deen, pp. 31–68). Aksant.
Van Zanten, M., & Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2021). Mathematics curriculum reform and its implementation in textbooks: Early addition and subtraction in realistic mathematics education. Mathematics, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070752
Wake, G. (2015). Preparing for workplace numeracy: a modelling perspective. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0704-5
Wijaya, A., & Dewayani, S. (2021). Framework Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–108.
Yuda, E. K., & Rosmilawati, I. (2024). Literasi Numerasi di Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Indikator PISA 2023; Systematic Literatur Review. Journal of Instructional Development Researches, 4(2), 172–191.
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
