Challenges and Institutional Dynamics of Inclusive Learning Evaluation in Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Ahmad Rasidi Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Fauzan Fauzan Universitas Hamzanwadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v5i3.3503

Keywords:

Learning evaluation, Inclusive education, Primary school, Teacher competence, Parental participation, Evaluasi pembelajaran, Pendidikan inklusif, Sekolah dasar, Kompetensi guru, Partisipasi orang tua

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik evaluasi pembelajaran di sekolah dasar inklusif di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah, dengan menyoroti tantangan, faktor penentu, dan implikasinya terhadap pengembangan evaluasi yang adil dan adaptif. Studi ini dilatarbelakangi oleh masih terbatasnya kajian empiris yang mengkaji secara komprehensif hubungan antara kompetensi guru, dukungan institusi, dan partisipasi orang tua dalam praktik evaluasi pembelajaran inklusif di jenjang sekolah dasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods dengan desain sequential explanatory, Diawali dengan pengumpulan data kuantitatif melalui survei terhadap guru, kemudian diperdalam dengan data kualitatif melalui wawancara dan observasi. Data kuantitatif dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan regresi linier berganda, sedangkan data kualitatif dianalisis secara tematik untuk memperkuat interpretasi temuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik evaluasi pembelajaran di sekolah dasar inklusif masih didominasi oleh tes tertulis, meskipun mulai berkembang penggunaan observasi, penilaian kinerja, dan portofolio. Analisis regresi mengungkapkan bahwa kompetensi guru, dukungan institusi, dan partisipasi orang tua berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kualitas evaluasi pembelajaran inklusif, dengan partisipasi orang tua sebagai prediktor terkuat. Tantangan utama meliputi keterbatasan instrumen evaluasi adaptif dan tingginya beban administrasi guru, sementara peluang pengembangan terletak pada pelatihan berkelanjutan dan pemanfaatan teknologi asesmen. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada penguatan kerangka evaluasi pembelajaran inklusif dengan menegaskan pentingnya sinergi antara guru, institusi, dan orang tua guna mewujudkan evaluasi yang lebih adil, kontekstual, dan bermakna bagi seluruh peserta didik.

This study aims to analyze learning evaluation practices in inclusive elementary schools in Lombok Tengah Regency, highlighting the challenges, determining factors, and implications for the development of fair and adaptive evaluation. This study was motivated by the limited empirical research that comprehensively examines the relationship between teacher competence, institutional support, and parental participation in inclusive learning evaluation practices at the elementary school level. This study uses a mixed methods approach with a sequential explanatory design. It begins with quantitative data collection through a survey of teachers, then deepens with qualitative data through interviews and observations. Quantitative data are analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression, while qualitative data are analyzed thematically to strengthen the interpretation of findings. The results of the study show that learning evaluation practices in inclusive elementary schools are still dominated by written tests, although the use of observation, performance assessment, and portfolios is beginning to develop. Regression analysis reveals that teacher competence, institutional support, and parental participation have a positive and significant effect on the quality of inclusive learning evaluation, with parental participation being the strongest predictor. The main challenges include the limitations of adaptive evaluation instruments and the high administrative burden on teachers, while opportunities for development lie in continuous training and the use of assessment technology. This study contributes to strengthening the framework for inclusive learning evaluation by emphasizing the importance of synergy between teachers, institutions, and parents in order to realize a more equitable, contextual, and meaningful evaluation for all students.

References

Abu-Rasheed, H., Weber, C., & Fathi, M. (2023, July). Context based learning: a survey of contextual indicators for personalized and adaptive learning recommendations–a pedagogical and technical perspective. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1210968). Frontiers Media SA.

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Al Haq, N., & Kurnia, L. K. (2022). Implementasi Sistem Evaluasi dan Penilaian Anaka Berkebutuhan Khusus dalam Pendidikan Inklusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sultan Agung, 2(3), 268–278.

Alisultanova, A., & Qu, X. (2025). Barriers and enablers—early years educators’ Understanding of inclusive education for children with autism spectrum conditions in Baku, Azerbaijan. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1-16.

Allison, A. L., Lorencatto, F., Michie, S., & Miodownik, M. (2022). Barriers and enablers to food waste recycling: a mixed methods study amongst UK citizens. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2729.

Anggara, D. S., & Anwar, S. (2017). Statistika Pendidikan. Tangerang Selatan: UNPAM Press.

Apriliya Ernawati, E., Hanurawan, F., Andrini Farida, I., & Arsyiatul Alfath, E. (2025). Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Teachers’ Perceptions and Challenges of Inclusion in Early Childhood Education. 9(6), 2025–2278. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v9i5.7446

Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage Au.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Introduction to Mixed-Methods Research. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management, 1 (1), 415–425.

Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54.

Graham, L. J., Medhurst, M., Tancredi, H., Spandagou, I., & Walton, E. (2023). Fundamental concepts of inclusive education. In Inclusive Education for the 21st century (pp. 60-80). Routledge.

Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2022). Promoting fair and just school environments: Developing inclusive youth. Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences, 9(1), 81-89.

Koskela, T., & Sinkkonen, H. M. (2025). Parental involvement in supporting their children in inclusive education: Cooperation with school professionals in Finland. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2464272.

Kurniati, D., Zamroni, E., Utomo, S., Lestari, I., & Espejo Mirana, A. (2025). Research Trends on Parental Involvement in Inclusive Education and its Implications for Inclusive Education Programs: A Bibliometric Analysis. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 17(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v17i1.6438

Kurniawan, M., Ysh, A. S., Ayu, N., & Murniati, N. (2025). Inclusive Education Practices In Indonesian Elementary Schools: Planning, Implementation, And Evaluation. 14(4).

Legodi-rakgalakane, K., & Mokhampanyane, M. (2022). Evaluation of educators’ experiences and practices of inclusive education in primary schools: A South African perspective. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 6(12), 255-263.

Marhamah, M., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2025). Designing a Game-Based PMRI Learning Trajectory on Money Value Equivalence for Autistic Students. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(3), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i3.3372

Meylani, R. (2024). A comparative analysis of traditional and modern approaches to assessment and evaluation in education. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 520-555.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.

Muliadi, M., Tsaputra, A., Rahmahtrisilvia, R., & Nurhastuti, N. (2025). Parental role in supporting inclusive education for children with autism. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(3), 832–844. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i3.5351

Pineda, P., & Steinhardt, I. (2023). The debate on student evaluations of teaching: Global convergence confronts higher education traditions. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(4), 859-879.

Puspita, B. (2024). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi Citra Bakti, 2(1), 55–63.

Putri, K. E. S., Wahyuni, M. R., Hasibuan, W. F., & Mustika, D. (2024). Evaluasi Dan Penilaian Yang Adil Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Inklusi. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(6), 6.

Rahimi, S. (2024). Saturation in qualitative research: An evolutionary concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 6, 100174.

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131.

Susiaty, U. D., Firdaus, M., & Andriati, N. (2021). Pengembangan Alat Peraga Papan Positif Negatif Berbasis Metode Montessori pada Siswa dengan ADHD. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i1.642

Viktorin, J. (2018). Teacher assistant in the inclusive school environment. The Educational Review, USA, 2(6).

Wijayanti, K., Liftiah, L., & Budiyono, B. (2025). Assessing Inclusive Education in Elementary Schools: Insight from the Merdeka Curriculum. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2).

Yuhana, U. L., Yuniarno, E. M., Rahayu, W., & Pardede, E. (2024). A Context-based Question Selection Model to Support the Adaptive Assessment of Learning: A study of online learning assessment in elementary schools in Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9517-9540.

Zhansulu, S., Batima, T., Temirov, K., Shalgynbayeva, K., Shamurat, O., & Mukhamedzhanov, B. (2022). Supporting Children with Special Educational Needs as a Socio-Pedagogical Problem. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(7), 2262–2273.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Rasidi, A., & Fauzan, F. (2025). Challenges and Institutional Dynamics of Inclusive Learning Evaluation in Elementary Schools. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 655–678. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v5i3.3503

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.