Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i3.729Keywords:
Gaya Kognitif, Prosedur Polya, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, Cognitive Style, Polya Procedure, Mathematical Problem SolvingAbstract
Siswa dituntut dapat menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah dalam setiap pembelajaran matematika. Namun ketika observasi awal, banyak ditemukan siswa kurang mampu memecahkan soal matematis dengan tepat dan sedikit siswa yang dapat menjawab persoalan matematis berdasarkan prosedur Polya terutama di Sumenep. Tujuan Penelitian untuk mendeskripsikan tingkat pemahaman peserta didik dalam mencari solusi dari permasalahan matematis yang terdapat pada materi Himpunan berdasarkan gaya kognitif Field Dependent (FD) dan Field Independent (FI). Metode penelitian ini yaitu deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian berupa data yang diambil dari peserta didik kelas 7A dan 7B di MTs Negeri 1 Sumenep menggunakan tes GEFT berdasarkan indikator pemecahan masalah Polya yang mengacu pada indikator NCTM. Dalam melakukan analisis lebih lanjut, dipilih 4 orang sebagai subjek untuk dilakukan wawancara secara mendalam dan dilakukan analisis pemecahan masalah. Dalam penelitian ini didapatkan peserta didik jenis FD kurang baik dalam memecahkan masalah matematis, sedangkan pada peserta didik jenis FI sangat baik dalam memecahkan masalah matematis dikarenakan mampu memenuhi semua indikator pemecahan masalah.
Students are required to be able to solve problem-solving problems in every mathematics lesson. However, during the initial observations, it was found that many students were less able to solve mathematical problems correctly and few students were able to answer mathematical problems based on the Polya procedure, especially in Sumenep. The purpose of the study was to describe the level of understanding of students in finding solutions to mathematical problems contained in the set material based on Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles. This research method is descriptive and qualitative. The results of the study are data taken from students in grades 7A and 7B at MTs Negeri 1 Sumenep using the GEFT test based on Polya's problem-solving indicators which refer to the NCTM indicator. In conducting further analysis, 4 people were selected as subjects for in-depth interviews and problem-solving analysis. In this study, it was found that the FD-type students were not good at solving mathematical problems, while the FI-type students were very good at solving mathematical problems because they were able to problem-solving indicators.
References
Anthycamurty, R. C., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2018). Analysis of Problem Solving in Terms of Cognitive Style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 012146.
Arifin, S., Kartono, K., & Hidayah, I. (2019). The Analysis of Problem-Solving Ability in Terms of Cognitive Style in Problem Based Learning Model with Diagnostic Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(2), 147-156.
Basir, M. A., & Maharani, H. R. (2016). Reasoning Ability Students in Mathematics Problems Solving Viewed from Cognitive Style. The 2nd International Seminar on Educational Technology 2016, 99.
Budiargo, P., & Achmad S., (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Pada Brain Based Learning Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Emosional. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; UJMER 5 (1).
Desmita. (2014). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: Rosda.
Kuzle, A. (2013). Patterns of Metacognitive Behavior During Mathematics Problem-Solving in a Dynamic Geometry Environment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education – IΣJMΣ, 8(1), 20– 40.
Mawaddah, S., & Anisah, H. (2015). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Generatif (Generative Learning) di SMP. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2).
Mashuri, Nitoviani, N. D., & Hendikawati, P. (2018). The Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Student on Learning with Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS) Model in Term of Student Learning Style. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research,7(1), 1-7.
Mefoh, P. C., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. C., & Chijioke, A. O. (2017). Effect of Cognitive Style and Gender on Adolescents’ Problem-Solving Ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 47-52.
National Council of Teacher Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Excecutive Summary Principle and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Nur, A. S., & Palobo, M. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif Dan Gender. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), 139-148.
Nurmutia, H. E. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 98-103.
OECD. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Polya, G. (1973). How to Solve It (2nd ed). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Prabawa, E. A., & Zaenuri, Z. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Model Project Based Learning Bernuansa Etnomatematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 120-129.
Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. (2016). Exploration of Mathematics Problem Solving Process Based on The Thinking Level of Students in Junior High School. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 11/14: 7278–7285.
Saygılı, S. (2017). Examining The Problem-Solving Skills and The Strategies Used by High School Students in Solving Non-routine Problems. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 91-114.
Setyadi, D., Masi, L., Salim, S., & Kadir, K. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Amal Pendidikan, 1(1), 63-69.
Simamora, R. E., & Saragih, S. (2019). Improving Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61-72.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R dan D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Szetela, W., & Nicol, C. (1992). Evaluating Problem Solving in Mathematics. Educational Leadership, 5, 42–45.
Torio, M. Z. C. (2015). Development of Instructional Material Using Algebra as a Tool in Problem Solving. International journal of education and research, 2(1), 569-586.
Uji, L. T., Asikin, M., & Mulyono, M. (2021). Problem Solving Ability Viewed from Students’ Cognitive Style on Brain-Based Learning Model Based on Self-Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(A), 21-26.
Ulya, H. (2015). Hubungan Gaya Kognitif dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Konseling Gusjigang, 1(2).
Winarti, D. (2017). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Pada Materi Pecahan di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(6), 1–9.
Witkin, H. A. (1971). A Manual for The Embedded Figures Tests. Consulting Psychologists Press.
Yuwono, T., Supanggih, M., & Ferdiani, R. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Prosedur Polya. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 1.
Zulnaidi, H., Heleni, S., & Syafri, M. (2021). Effects of SSCS Teaching Model on Students' Mathematical Problem-solving Ability and Self-efficacy. International Journal of Instruction. 14(1), 475–488.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
