Learning Trajectory of Percentage Profit and Loss using Selling New Math Pempek Context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i1.2618

Keywords:

PMRI approach, Design research, Hypothetical Learning Trajectory, lintasan pembelajaran, new math pempek, pendidikan matematika realistik, persentase keuntungan dan kerugian, learning trajectory, realistic mathematics education, profit and loss percentages

Abstract

Berawal dari ketidakpahaman peserta didik tentang menentukan persentase untung atau rugi. Peserta didik mengalami kesulitan dalam menghubungkan konsep persentase dengan situasi nyata, sehingga pembelajaran menjadi kurang bermakna. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan lintasan belajar menggunakan pendekatan PMRI dengan konteks menjual new math pempek untuk membantu peserta didik memahami konsep persentase untung dan rugi secara lebih mendalam. Penelitian ini melibatkan 25 siswa di MTs Darul Ulum dan menggunakan metode penelitian desain: preliminary design, experimental design, dan retrospective analysis. Data dianalisis secara retrospektif melalui jawaban lembar kerja siswa, video, dokumentasi berupa foto, dan wawancara. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah lintasan belajar yang terdiri dari tiga kegiatan: (1) memperkirakan dan menghitung persentase keuntungan, (2) memperkirakan dan menghitung persentase kerugian, dan (3) menyelesaikan masalah persentase keuntungan dan kerugian yang lebih rumit. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual, siswa lebih tertarik dan percaya diri dalam memahami materi, sehingga pembelajaran menjadi lebih bermakna.

It all started with students' lack of understanding of determining profit or loss percentages. Students had difficulty connecting the concept of percentages to real-life situations, making learning less meaningful. This study aimed to create a learning trajectory using the PMRI approach in the context of selling New Math Pempek to help students understand the concept of profit and loss percentages more deeply. This study involved 25 students at MTs Darul Ulum and employed design research methods, including preliminary design, experimental design, and retrospective analysis. Data were analyzed retrospectively through student worksheet answers, videos, photo documentation, and interviews. The results of this study were a learning trajectory consisting of three activities: (1) estimating and calculating profit percentages, (2) estimating and calculating loss percentages, and (3) solving more complex profit and loss percentage problems. By adopting a contextual approach, students became more engaged and confident in understanding the material, thereby making learning more meaningful.

Author Biographies

Ratu Ilma Indra Putri, Universitas Sriwijaya

Profesor

Zulkardi Zulkardi, Universitas Sriwijaya

Profesor

Hapizah Hapizah, Universitas Sriwijaya

Lecturer

References

Abadi, M. K., Pujiastuti, & Assaat. (2016). Development of Teaching Materials Based Interactive Scientific Approach towards the Concept of Social Arithmetic For Junior High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Problems for the Topic of Fractions. In Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. Canadian Center of Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133

Astria, R. T. (2023). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika pada Alat Musik Tradisional. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i2.1334

Fauzan, A., Armiati, A., & Ceria, C. (2018). A Learning Trajectory for Teaching Social Arithmetic using RME Approach. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012121

Firdausi, I. (2022). Game Edukasi Android Deck Card untuk Memfasilitasi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Materi Pecahan. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i3.736

Fürstenau, B., & Hommel, M. (2019). Developing financial competence about mortgage loans by informal learning using banks’ online calculators. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-019-0085-z

Isamer, N. P., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi, Z. (2023). The Kite Project to improve junior high school students’ numeracy. Jurnal Elemen, 9(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.7168

Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a

Kuhnlein, Harriet V., & Receveur, O. (1996). Dietary Change and Traditional Food Systems of Indigenous People. Annual Reviews, 16(1), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.002221

Marleny, A. S., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2024). Pengembangan Soal AKM TIPE PISA pada Konteks Melemang Muara Enim Berbasis PMRI dan PJBL. Mathema Journal, 6(1), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v6i1.3591

Meryansumayeka, Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2019). How students learn fractions through pempek lenjer context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012028

Ningsih, Y. L., & Rohana, R. (2016). Prospective Teachers’ Ability in Mathematical Problem-Solving Through Reflective Learning. Infinity Journal, 5(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i2.214

Nuraeni, R., Ardiansyah, S. G., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Permasalahan Matematika Aritmatika Sosial Dalam Bentuk Cerita: Bagaimana Deskripsi Kesalahan-Kesalahan Jawaban Siswa? Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i1.3345

Nursyahidah, F., Saputro, B. A., Albab, I. U., & Aisyah, F. (2020). Pengembangan Learning Trajectory Based Instruction Materi Kerucut Menggunakan Konteks Megono Gunungan. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.591

Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Riskanita, A. D. (2022). Students’ problem-solving ability in solving algebra tasks using the context of Palembang. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp549-564

Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Sagita, L., Sari, N., Siligar, E. I. ., & Sukma, Y. (2025). Learning numeracy using new Pempek mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp1-22

Rahayu, W., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). The Innovative Learning of Social Arithmetic using Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2676

Ramadhan, M. H., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Resti, Y. (2024). Which is better between gold and its share? A context for designing financial mathematical task. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1115-1130. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1115-1130

Ramdhani, S., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2023). Development of Didactic Design for Learning Mathematics in Pesantren: Integration of Mathematics and Fiqh Learning. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i3.833

Rianasari, V. F., & Guzon, A. F. H. (2024). Investigating preservice secondary mathematics teachers ’ skills in posing realistic mathematics tasks. 10, 533–545. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i3.25607

Sadiah, D. S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2023). Miskonsepsi siswa ditinjau dari tingkat penyelesaian masalah pada materi operasi pecahan. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v2i1.1397

Sari, D. L., Fitriani, D. A., Khaeriyah, D. Z., Hartono, & Nursyahidah, F. (2022). Hypothetical Learning Trajectory pada Materi Peluang: Konteks Mainan Tradisional Ular Naga. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i2.699

Sari, E. F. P., & Putri, R. I. I. (2023). Math Teachers' Perceptions Regarding Financial Literacy. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.799

Sawatzki, C., & Goos, M. (2018). Cost , price and profit : what influences students ’ decisions about fundraising ? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 525–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0241-y

Sheldon, S., Pat, M., & Moscovitch, M. (2011). Neuropsychologia Episodic memory processes mediated by the medial temporal lobes contribute to open-ended problem solving. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2439–2447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.021

Sherraden, M. S., Johnson, L., Guo, B., & Elliott, W. (2011). Financial Capability in Children: Effects of Participation in a School-Based Financial Education and Savings Program. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-010-9220-5

Siligar, E. I. P., Lesmana, H., & Zabeta, M. (2022). Understanding the concept of percent using the egg rack. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(4), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i4.20676

Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience. Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience, 1–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7

Wargadalem, F. R., Wasino, & Yulifar, L. (2023). Pempek Palembang: history, food-making tradition, and ethnic identity. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-023-00209-z

Wijaya, R. P., Budiarto, M. T., & Wijayanti, P. (2021). Development of Realistic Mathematics Learning Tools to Improve Students’ Mathematical Literacy Ability. Mathematics Education Journal, 5(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/DOI:10.22219/mej.v5i2.16571

Zulkardi. (2002). Developing A Learning Environment On Realistic Mathematics Education For Indonesian Student Teachers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede). Thesis University of Twente, Enschede. - With Refs. - With Summary in Ducth ISBN 90 365 18 45 8, 1–218.

Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2019). New School Mathematics Curricula, PISA, and PMRI in Indonesia. In: Vistro-Yu, C., Toh, T. (eds) School Mathematics Curricula (Mathematic). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003064275-1

Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Wijaya, A. (2020). Two Decades of Realistic Mathematics Education in Indonesia. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Eds.), International Reflections on the Netherlands Didactics of Mathematics. ICME-13 Monographs, 325–340. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20223-1_18

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

E.I, E. P. S., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Z., & Hapizah, H. (2025). Learning Trajectory of Percentage Profit and Loss using Selling New Math Pempek Context. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i1.2618

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.