Computational Thinking of Prospective Mathematics Teacher Viewed from Entrepreneur Character
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.782Keywords:
Computational Thinking, Entrepreneur, Pembelajaran Matematika, Mathematics, Mathematics LearningAbstract
Computational Thingking (CT) dan entrepreneurship membutuhkan pemikiran matematika, begitu pula pada pembelajaran matematika membutuhkan pola pikir CT dan karakter entrepreneurship. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengekplorasi potensi CT dilihat dari karakter entrepreneur. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Tiga mahasiswa calon guru Matematika menjadi subyek terpilih dari duapuluh subyek penelitian. Pengambilan data melalui data tes, angket dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa aktivitas CT dari karakter entrepreneur tinggi dan sedang ditemukan aktivitas CT dengan komponen abstraksi, algoritma, kreativitas, dekomposisi, dan generalisasi. Kuatnya karakter enterpenur berupa kreativitas memunculkan komponen baru dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Kreativitas direkomendasikan menjadi salah satu komponen CT dalam pembelajaran matematika.
Computational Thinking (CT) and entrepreneurship require mathematical thinking, as well as learning mathematics requires a CT mindset and entrepreneurial character. This research reports on an educational research study that explores the potential of CT in terms of entrepreneurial character. Research using a descriptive approach. Three prospective mathematics teacher students were selected from the twenty subjects of this study. Data collection through data tests, questionnaires and interviews. The results of the study revealed that CT activity had a high entrepreneurial character and moderate CT activity was found with components of abstraction, algorithm, creativity, decomposition, and generalization. The strong character of the entrepreneur in the form of creativity raises a new component in solving mathematical problems. Creativity is recommended to be a component of CT in learning mathematics.
References
Afriansyah, E. A., Herman, T., Turmudi, T., Dahlan, J. A. (2020) Mendesain Soal Berbasis Masalah untuk Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Matematika Calon Guru. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 239-250.
Afriansyah, E. A., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Prospective teachers’ thinking through realistic mathematics education based emergent modeling in fractions. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 605-618.
Aminah, N., & Wahyuni, I. (2019). The Ability of Pedagogic Content Knowledge (PCK) of Mathematics Teacher Candidate Based on Multiple Intelegent. Journal of Physics: Convereance Series. 1280, hal. 306-316. Indonesia: IOP.
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2020). Analysis of Technology Pedagogic Content Knowledge Ability for Junior High School Teacher. International Conference on Agriculture, Social Sciences,Education, Technology and Health (ICASSETH) (hal. 245-259). Cirebon: Atlantic Perss.
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022a). A teaching Practice Design Based on a Computational Thinking for Prospective Math Teacher Using Ed-Tech Apps. International Journal Interactive Mobile Technology. 16(14) 43-62.
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022b). Computational Thinking Process of Prospective Matjematics Teacher in Solving Diophantine Linear Equation Problem. European Journal of Education Research. 11(2) 1495-1507.
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn Smit, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). Computational Thingking Framework: Implication for Teacher Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47-57.
Anna L , F. (2014). Quality Criteria And Indicators For Responsible Research And Innovation. Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 120-125.
Bacconi, e. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education. Italian Journal Of Educational Teachnology, 39-55.
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.
Benton , L., Hoyles , C., Kalas, I., & & Noss, R. (2017). Bridging Primary Programming And Mathematics. Digital Experiences In Mathematics Education, 115-138.
Bernstein, A., Hadash, Y., Lichtash, Y., Tanay, G., Shepherd, K., & Fresco, D. (2015). Decentering and Related Constructs: A Critical Review and Metacognitive Processes Model. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 599-617.
Bradbury, H., Waddell, S., O’Brien, K., Apgar, M., Teehankee, B., & Fazey, I. (2019). A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3-10.
Cansu, S. K., & Cansu, F. K. (2019). An Overview of Computational Thingking. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(1), 1-11.
Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design 3rd Ed. New York, 260.
Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2014, March 2). Developing Computational Thingking in the Classroom: a framework. . Diambil kembali dari Commons Attribution-Non Commercial license;:
Dal , M., Elo, J., Leffler, E., Svedberg, G., & Westerberg, M. (2016). Research On Pedagogical Entrepreneurship. Education Inquiry, 159-182.
Faiziyah, N., Hanan, N. A., & Azizah, N. N. (2022). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal berbasis Etnomatematika Tipe Multiple Solutions Task. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 495-506.
Fauzan, B. A., Kusnadi, D., & Sofyan, A. (2023). Changes in Students' Cognitive Abilities through STEM-Based Learning in Elementary Schools. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 89-100.
Fuber, S. (2012). Shut down or restart? The way forward for computing in UK schools (1 ed.). London: The Royal Society.
Gadanidis , G., Clements, E., & Yiu, C. (2018). Group Theory Computational Thinking And Young Mathematicians . Mathematical Thinking And Learning, 32-53.
Hemmendinger, D. (2010). A Plea for Modesty. Acm Inroads, 1(2), 4-7.
Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2020). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: Addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education, 31(2), 209-229.
ISTE. (2011). Operational definitions of computational thinking. Dipetik Marc 01, 2020, dari
ISTE. (2016). Standars for Students. Dipetik March 08, 2021, dari
Kusumawardani, S. (2020). Merdeka Belajar, Kampus Merdeka, dan MOOCs. . Yogyakarta, Jawa, Jawa Tengah.
Meilina, A., Mariana, N., & Rahmawati, I. (2023). Implementasi lkpd pmri dalam materi membilang sampai 20 untuk siswa fase a sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(1), 45-54.
Michael, D., Janne, E., Eva, L., Gudrun, S., & Mats, W. (2016). Research on pedagogical entrepreneurship – a literature review based on studies from Finland, Iceland and Sweden. Education Inquiry, 30-45.
Palmér, M. J. (2018). Teaching for Enterpreneurial and Mathematical Competences: Teaching Stepping Out of Their Comfort Zone. Spinger International Publishing, 14-32.
Permatasari, R. P. D., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Kendala orang tua dalam mendampingi siswa ditinjau dari hasil belajar matematika secara online. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 1(1), 27-36.
Pierre, B., J., H., T. (2017). Innovation As a Critique Of Technology Assesment. Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 240-250.
Rafique, G. M., Mahmood, K., Warraich, N. F., & Rehman, S. U. (2021). Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 102346.
Rozi, F. A., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis berdasarkan disposisi matematis siswa. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 4(2), 172-185.
Santrock, J. (2011) Life-span development. Jakarta, Erlangga.
Sarasvathy, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 113-135.
Sari, R. F., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan belief siswa pada materi persamaan dan pertidaksamaan linear. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 275-288.
Sari, N. M., & Yulia, P. (2023). Kompetensi Kepribadian Guru Matematika di Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 73-82.
Sumartini, T. S. (2022). Pengaruh Habit of Mind terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis melalui Metode Pembelajaran Improve. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 167-178.
Sundari. (2015). Pengaruh Kreativitas dan kecerdasan Spiritual terhadap Efikasi Diri dan Kemandirian Mahasiswa Jurusan Manjemen Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Majapahit Mojokerto. Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan, 64-76.
Weintrop, D. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classroom. J Sci Educ Technol, 127-147.
Wing, J. (2008). Computational Thingking and Thingking about Computing. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, physical and Engineering Science, 366(1881), 23-32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
