Analisis bibliometrik kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa smp ditinjau dari gaya kognitif: tren, tema, dan arah penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v4i2.2763Keywords:
bibliometrics, cognitive style, junior high school students, literature analysis, mathematical problem-solving ability, siswa SMP, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, bibliometrik, gaya kognitif, analisis literaturAbstract
Students' mathematical problem-solving ability (KPMM) has become an important focus in mathematics education. Cognitive styles, such as field-independent (FI) and field-dependent (FD), are known to influence the thinking process in solving problems. This study aims to map trends, topics, and gaps in the literature on the relationship between cognitive styles and MCA of junior high school students through a bibliometric approach to 65 articles published in the period 2010-2023. Data were collected through Google Scholar using Publish or Perish software and then analyzed using VOSviewer. The results show an increasing trend in research since 2017, with a peak in 2020. The main clusters include cognitive style, problem-solving, and secondary mathematics education. Some topics such as technomathematical fluency and realistic mathematical education (RME), are still under-researched. This study provides new directions for future research and policy implications in developing teaching strategies based on cognitive styles.
Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis (KPMM) siswa telah menjadi fokus penting dalam pendidikan matematika. Gaya kognitif, seperti Field Independent (FI) dan Field Dependent (FD), diketahui mempengaruhi proses berpikir dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Studi ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tren, topik, dan kesenjangan dalam literatur tentang hubungan gaya kognitif dan KPMM siswa SMP melalui pendekatan bibliometrik terhadap 65 artikel yang dipublikasikan dalam rentang 2010-2023. Data dikumpulkan melalui Google Scholar menggunakan software Publish or Perish, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan VOSviewer. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan tren penelitian sejak 2017, dengan puncak pada 2020. Klaster utama mencakup cognitive style, problem-solving, dan secondary mathematics education. Beberapa topik seperti technomathematical fluency dan realistic mathematical education (RME) masih kurang diteliti. Studi ini memberikan arah baru bagi penelitian masa depan dan implikasi kebijakan dalam pengembangan strategi pengajaran berbasis gaya kognitif.
References
Fadlilah, M. F., dkk. (2021). Model pembelajaran TAI berbasis video untuk KPMM. JRPMS, 5(2).
Fauzi, R. M. (2020). Reflektif matematis siswa SMP. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Hakim, L. (2020). Analisis bibliometrik penelitian inkubator bisnis pada publikasi ilmiah terindeks Scopus. Procuratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(2), 176–189.
Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V. T. (2020). Research on education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947
Harzing, A.-W. (2007). Publish or perish [Computer software]. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
Hasanah, Y. (2016). Deskripsi kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP Muhammadiyah Cimanggu. Repository UMP.
Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2017). Mathematical problem solving with technology: The techno-mathematical fluency of a student-with-GeoGebra. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1115–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9728-8
Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., dkk. (2021). A meta-analysis of GeoGebra software in mathematics learning. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
Kaliky, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan.
Lestari, A., dkk. (2024). Gaya kognitif dan KPMM siswa. JP2MS.
Lozada, E., Guerrero-Ortiz, C., Coronel, A., & Medina, R. (2021). Classroom methodologies for teaching and learning ordinary differential equations: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Mathematics, 9(7), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070745
Marianti, M. S. (2023). Mathematical problem-solving ability of junior high school students on flat-sided geometric shapes. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(3), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v2i3.1767
Mujahid, M. L. (2021). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Jember.
Muniri, M., & Yulistiyah, E. (2022). Representasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif-implusif. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i2.1097
Phan, T. T., dkk. (2022). A bibliometric review on realistic mathematics education. European Journal of Educational Research.
Pitriyani, D. C., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2023). Middle School Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Reviewed from Students' Learning Interests. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 2(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v2i3.1691
Pradiarti, R. A. (2022). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
Purwaningsih, R., & Ardani, A. (2020). Gaya kognitif field independent dan field dependent dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 1–10.
Rahmawati, T. D., Santoso, A. D., Kristanto, V. H., & Rini, A. P. (2024). Analysis of Critical Mathematical Thinking Skills in Level 1 Cadets of Surabaya Maritime. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i1.1520
Rahmawati, D., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2023). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis melalui proses planning, execution, dan revision ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematis siswa. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i2.1336
Rosdiana, N., & Sugiarto, S. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Skripsi Universitas PGRI.
Rosdiana, N., & Sugiarto, S. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Imajinatif: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan.
Setiawan, M. I. (2019). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah (Tidak dipublikasikan).
Son, A. (2020). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Tamur, M., Juandi, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2020). The effectiveness of the application of mathematical software in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 867–884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13453a
Tamur, M., dkk. (2021). A meta-analysis of the past decade of mathematics learning based on CAS. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012060
Ulfa, Y. L., Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2022). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMA pada materi jarak pada bangun ruang. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 415-424. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i3.732
Ulya, M. F. N., & Surnijati, S. (2013). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics.
Wang, C. (2019). Cognitive diagnostic assessment in mathematics: Recent development and future directions. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12252
Witkin, H. A., dkk. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hasanuddin Hasanuddin, Nur Anita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
