Analysis of Number Material in Seventh-Grade Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on Praxeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i3.2013Keywords:
bahan ajar, matematika, materi bilangan, review praksiologi, teaching material, mathematics, topic of numbers, praxeology reviewAbstract
Ketersediaan buku teks matematika yang tidak sesuai dapat mempengaruhi rendahnya kinerja akademik siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bahan ajar matematika sekolah dari perspektif praxeologis, di mana peneliti berusaha memahami bagaimana siswa berinteraksi dengan materi yang disajikan dalam bahan ajar, bagaimana mereka membuat keputusan tentang masalah mana yang akan diselesaikan, dan bagaimana desain serta konten buku teks mempengaruhi hasil belajar mereka. Ini adalah implementasi paradigma interpretatif dalam penelitian desain didaktik. (DDR). Melalui studi dokumen (dalam penelitian kualitatif yang dirancang secara fenomenologis) pada bahan ajar matematika sekolah Indonesia versi Kurikulum Merdeka, hasil yang diperoleh adalah: Komponen tugas (T) dalam materi tentang bilangan besar menggunakan teknik operasional; Komponen teknik (τ) sesuai karena informasi yang disampaikan dalam setiap pertemuan memiliki kontinuitas; Komponen teknologi (θ) belum sesuai, sehingga perbaikan dan peningkatan diperlukan dalam pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi; dan Komponen teori (Θ) belum sepenuhnya selaras dengan teori konstruktivis, di mana siswa dapat membangun pengetahuan berdasarkan pengalaman masing-masing.
The availability of mathematics textbooks that are not appropriate can influence students' low academic performance. This research aims to analyze school mathematics teaching materials from a praxeological perspective, where the researcher seeks to understand how students engage with the material presented in the teaching materials, how they make decisions about which problems to solve, and how the design and content of textbooks affect their learning outcomes. This implements the interpretive paradigm in didactical design research (DDR). This study will involve three principal stages in the data analysis procedure. Through document studies (in phenomenologically designed qualitative research) on the Indonesian school mathematics teaching materials version of the Merdeka Curriculum, the results obtained are: The task component (T) in the material on large numbers uses operational techniques; The technique component (τ) is appropriate because the information conveyed in each meeting has continuity; The technology component (θ) is not yet appropriate, so improvements and enhancements are needed in the development of information and communication technology-based learning media; and The theory component (Θ) is not yet fully aligned with constructivist theory, where students can build knowledge based on their respective experiences. The praxeological study of this teaching module provides a new perspective on how task design plays an important role in making the presentation of material more acceptable to students.
References
Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Reseach Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9
Azzahra, N. (2023). Analisis Materi Perbandingan pada Buku Teks Kelas VII Berdasarkan Praksiologi. S2 thesis. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 4), (pp. 21-30).
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Fuadiah, N. F., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstanding: A case study on negative integers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12127a
Gauss, C. F. (1801). Disquisitiones arithmeticae. New Haven. ISBN 978-0-300-19425-8. OCLC 951623297.
Guez, A., Peyre, H., Le Cam, M., Gauvrit, N., & Ramus, F. (2018). Are high-IQ students more at risk of school failure? Intelligence, 71(October), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.09.003
Hakim, T. (2005). Belajar Secara Efektif. Jakarta: Puspa Swara.
Hidayah, M., & Forgasz, H. (2020). A comparison of mathematical tasks types used in Indonesian and Australian textbooks based on geometry contents. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11754.385-404
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2018). A comparative analysis of linear functions in Korean and American standards-based secondary textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1025-1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1440327
Kartina, T., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2024). Dominant Visual Learning Styles Among Students: Implications for Differentiated Learning. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i2.2093
Khasanah, U., Rahayu, R., & Ristiyani. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas IV Materi Bangun Datar Berdasarkan Teori Polya. Jurnal Didaktika, 1(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.17509/didaktika.v1i2.36538
Liberna, H. (2018). Hubungan Gaya Belajar Visual dan Kecemasan Diri terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMK Negeri 41 Jakarta. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 98-108.
Makowski, M. B. (2020). The written and oral justifications of mathematical claims of middle school pre-service teachers. Research in Mathematics Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14794802.2020.1777190
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., Fishbein, B., & Pirls, T. &. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Nurhasanah, A., Syafari, R., & Nurfaidah, A. R. (2022). Kesesuaian Buku Teks Matematika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i2.701
Pantaleon, K. V., Tamur, M., & Men, F. E. (2024). Metaphorical Thinking Intervention in Learning and Its Impact on Mathematical Reasoning Ability. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i1.1973
Pusporini, W., Widodo, S. A., Wijayanti, A., Wijayanti, N., Utami, W. B., Taqiyudin, M., & Irfan, M. (2023). Mathematical knowledge content in junior high school curriculum: a comparative study of the 2013 curriculum and merdeka curriculum. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 389-404. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.795
Putra, Z. H., Witri, G., & Sari, I. K. (2020). Pengetahuan Didaktika Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar tentang Pecahan Ditinjau dari Teori Antropologi Didaktik. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2056
Ramda, A. H. (2017). Analisis kesesuaian materi buku teks Kemendikbud matematika kelas VII dengan Kurikulum 2013. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 12-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14057
Safitra, M. D., Hapizah, Mulyono, B., & Susanti, E. (2023). Numeration-Based Teaching Materials on Algebra Shape Materials for Blended Learning. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.793
Saepuloh, A. R., Luritawaty, I. P., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2024). Assessing Mathematical Understanding in Fourth-Grade Students: A Focus on Multiplication and Division Skills. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(3), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i3.2210
Sari, F. Y., Supriadi, N., & Putra, R. W. Y. (2022). Model Pembelajaran CUPs Berbantuan Media Handout: Dampak terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i1.690
Sianturi, I. A. J., Ismail, Z., & Yang, D. C. (2021). A crossnational comparison of mathematical problems on numbers and operations-related topics in five countries. School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), 72- 84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12451
Suryadi, D. (2019). Didactical Design Research (DDR) Dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika.
Suwanto, F. R., Wijaya, A., Aprisal, Fauzi, A., & Tobondo, Y. V. (2023). Realistic Mathematics Textbook Toward the Students’ Mathematical Generalization Skills. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v12i2.784
Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2020). Comparing the lower secondary textbooks of Japan and England: A praxeological analysis of symmetry and transformations in geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 791-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09982-3
Litkowski, E. C., Duncan, R. J., Logan, J. A. R., & Purpura, D. J. (2020). When do preschoolers learn specific mathematics skills? Mapping the development of early numeracy knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 195, 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020. 104846
Tumay, H. (2016). Reconsidering learning difficulties and misconceptions in chemistry: Emergence in chemistry and its implications for chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp 00008h
Tusyana, E., & Luciana, D. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pkn. TERAMPIL: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 6(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v6i2.4812
Veldhuis, M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2020). Supporting primary school teachers' classroom assessment in mathematics education: Effects on student achievement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(3), 449-471. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13394 019-00270-5
Yayuk, E., Purwanto, As'Ari, A. R., & Subanji. (2020). Primary school students' creative thinking skills in mathematics problem solving. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1281 1281-1295
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
