Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Mahasiswa melalui Pembelajaran Think Talk Write
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.574Keywords:
Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis, Think Talk Write, kuasi eksperimen, Mathematical Communication Ability, quasi-experimentAbstract
Kemampuan komunikasi matematis perlu dimiliki mahasiswa untuk menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi perlu didukung oleh pembelajaran yang tepat, diantaranya pembelajaran Think Talk Write (TTW). Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu menganalisis pencapaian dan peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi mahasiswa antara yang belajar dengan pembelajaran Think Talk Write dan konvensional, serta mengetahui interpretasi peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi mahasiswa dari kedua kelas. Metode penelitian yaitu kuasi eksperimen. Teknik pengambilan sampel dengan teknik Purposive Sampling dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas di Program studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Indonesia. Analisis data secara kuantitatif dengan uji gain ternormalisasi dan Mann Whitney. Hasil penelitian yaitu pencapaian dan peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi mahasiswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran Think Talk Write lebih baik dari mahasiswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional, peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran Think Talk Write memiliki interpretasi tinggi sedangkan peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional memiliki interpretasi sedang.
Communication ability needs to be possessed by students to solve mathematical problems. Improved communication skills need to be supported by appropriate learning, one of which is learning Think Talk Write (TTW). The purpose of this study is to analyze the achievement and improvement of communication ability between students who are learning with Think Talk Write learning and conventional learning, as well as to find out interpretations of improved communication ability of students from both classes. The research method is quasi-experiment. The sampling technique is the purposive sampling technique by taking a sample of two classes in the Mathematics Education Study Program of the Institut Pendidikan Indonesia. Data analysis was performed quantitatively using the normalized gain test and Mann Whitney. The results of the study are the achievement and improved of communication skills of students who study with Think Talk Write learning is better than students who study with conventional learning, improvement of mathematical communication skills of students who study with Think Talk Write learning has a high interpretation while increasing mathematical communication skills of students who study with conventional learning have medium interpretations.
References
Alamiah, U., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Perbandingan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa antara yang Mendapatkan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education dan Open-Ended. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2). 207-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i2.308
Asmara, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa antara Model Eliciting Activities dan Discovery Learning. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 78-87.
Burns, M. (2004). Writing in math. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1522.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Lecturer, P., Morrison, K., & Lecturer, S. (2007). Research Methods in Education.
Dewi, S. S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran CTL. JIPMat, 3(2). 145-155.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Washington, DC: Alliance or Excellent Education.
Houston, K. (2009). How to Think Like A Mathematician. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huinker, D., & Laughlin, C. (1996). Talk your way into writing. Years book.
Husnah, U., & Surya, E. (2017). The Effectiveness of Think Talk Write Learning Model in Improving Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills at MTs Al Jami'yatul Washliyah Tembung. Internasional Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). 34 (2).
Lagur, D. S., Makur, A. P., & Ramda, A. H. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Head Together (NHT) terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3). 357-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v7i3.160
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Noraini, I. (2009). Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing. International Electronic Jurnal of Mathematics Education, 4.
Nuraeni, R. (2018). Perbandingan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Mahasiswa antara yang Mendapatkan Pembelajaran Group Investigation Dengan Konvensional pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus Integral. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2). 219-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v7i2.29
Piccolo, D. L., Harbaugh, A. P., Carter, T. A., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Quality of Instruction: Examining Discourse in Middle School Mathematics Instruction. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 376-410.
Rahmi, M., Yerizon, Y., & Muhdi, E. (2017). Tahap Preliminary Research Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta Didik Kelas VIII Mts/SMP. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2). 237-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i2.311
Rivard, L & Straw, S. B. (1999). The Effect of Talk and Writing on Learning Science : An Exploratory Study, 566–593.
Rubin, R. B., & Graham, E. E. (1988). Communication correlates of college success: An exploratory investigation. Communication Education, 37(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378700
Sherin, M. G. (2000). Facilitating Meaningful Discussion of Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(2), 122-125.
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students, creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Sullivan, P., Borcek, C., Walker, N., & Rennie, M. (2016). Exploring a structure for mathematics lessons that initiate learning by activating cognition on challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.12.002
Sumarmo, U. (2003). Pembelajaran Keterampilan Membaca Matematika. Makalah pada Pelatihan Nasional TOT Guru Matematika dan Bahasa Indonesia SLTP di Bandung.
Sumartini, T. S. (2017). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Melaui Model Pembelajaran Predict Observe Explanation. JES-MAT, 3(2), 167–176.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
