Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Antara Yang Mendapatkan Model Pembelajaran Brain Based Learning Dengan Numbered Head Together

Studi Eksperimen di SMP Negeri 1 Cikajang Kelas VII Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013

Authors

  • Wiwin Winarti STKIP Garut
  • Cici Nurul Haq STKIP Garut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v2i1.271

Keywords:

Learning Outcomes, Brain Based Learning, BBL, Numbered Head Together, NHT

Abstract

The research was conducted to distinguish the two models , this is Brain Based Learning ( BBL ) with the Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) to see the extent to which the two models are instrumental in improving the learning outcomes of students learning mathematics . Authors wanted to see if there are differences in mathematics achievement between students who received  Brain Based Learning ( BBL ) with Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) ? . The method that I use in this study is experimental research that is giving treatment to two different classes . The population in this study were all  students class VII of SMP Negeri 1 Cikajang with a randomly selected sample of the class VII- C and class VII - D . The instrument used to measure student learning outcomes in the form mathematics objective tests , administered before and after the treatment the author gives a treat .  From the analysis of the Mann Whitney test , to test initial value Zhitung = 1.72 and Ztabel = 2.24 with a significance level of 5 % ( α = 0.05 ) zhitung  which is located in the reception area Ho , Ho is accepted then it means there is no difference initial ability between experimental classes experiment I and experiment II . While the results of Mann Whitney test to post test at significance level of 5 % ( α = 0.05 ) , zhitung = 3.18 using the two test sides of Zhitung value = 3.18 > Ztabel = 2.24 , in other words zhitung rejection of Ho is in the region, in other words Ha accepteThe research was conducted to distinguish the two models , this is Brain Based Learning ( BBL ) with the Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) to see the extent to which the two models are instrumental in improving the learning outcomes of students learning mathematics . Authors wanted to see if there are differences in mathematics achievement between students who received  Brain Based Learning ( BBL ) with Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) ? . The method that I use in this study is experimental research that is giving treatment to two different classes . The population in this study were all  students class VII of SMP Negeri 1 Cikajang with a randomly selected sample of the class VII- C and class VII - D . The instrument used to measure student learning outcomes in the form mathematics objective tests, administered before and after the treatment the author gives a treat.  From the analysis of the Mann Whitney test , to test initial value Zhitung = 1.72 and Ztabel = 2.24 with a significance level of 5 % ( α = 0.05 ) zhitung  which is located in the reception area Ho , Ho is accepted then it means there is no difference initial ability between experimental classes experiment I and experiment II . While the results of Mann Whitney test to post test at significance level of 5 % ( α = 0.05 ) , zhitung = 3.18 using the two test sides of Zhitung value = 3.18 > Ztabel = 2.24 , in other words zhitung rejection of Ho is in the region, in other words Ha accepted . It means that there are differences in mathematics outcomes between students who received learning model with Brain Based Learning  (BBL) with Numbered Head Together (NHT)d . It means that there are differences in mathematics outcomes between students who received learning model with Brain Based Learning  (BBL) with Numbered Head Together (NHT)

Author Biography

Wiwin Winarti, STKIP Garut

The research was conducted to distinguish the two models , this is Brain Based Learning ( BBL ) with the Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) to see the extent to which the two models are instrumental in improving the learning outcomes of students learning mathematics . Authors wanted to see if there are differences in mathematics achievement between students who received  Brain Based Learning ( BBL ) with Numbered Head Together ( NHT ) ? . The method that I use in this study is experimental research that is giving treatment to two different classes . The population in this study were all  students class VII of SMP Negeri 1 Cikajang with a randomly selected sample of the class VII- C and class VII - D . The instrument used to measure student learning outcomes in the form mathematics objective tests , administered before and after the treatment the author gives a treat .  From the analysis of the Mann Whitney test , to test initial value Zhitung = 1.72 and Ztabel = 2.24 with a significance level of 5 % ( α = 0.05 ) zhitung  which is located in the reception area Ho , Ho is accepted then it means there is no difference initial ability between experimental classes experiment I and experiment II . While the results of Mann Whitney test to post test at significance level of 5 % ( α = 0.05 ) , zhitung = 3.18 using the two test sides of Zhitung value = 3.18 > Ztabel = 2.24 , in other words zhitung rejection of Ho is in the region , in other words Ha accepted . It means that there are differences in mathematics outcomes between students who received learning model with Brain Based Learning  (BBL) with Numbered Head Together (NHT).

References

Ahmadi, A. dan Prasetya, J. T. (2005). SBM (Strategi Belajar Mengajar) untuk Fakultas Tarbiyah Komponen MKDK. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto,S dkk.(2007). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Praktisi Pendidikan (Cetakan kedua).Jakarta:PT.Bumi Aksara.

Deporter, Bobby dan Mike Hermacky. (2009). Quantum Teaching. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.

Given, Barbara K. (2007). Brain Based teaching. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka.

Herdian. (2010). Model Pembelajaran NHT (Numbered Head Together). [online]. Tersedia http://herdy07.wordpress.com/2009/04/22/model-pembelajaran-nht-numbered-head-together/ [15 Januari 2013].

Hijriah, B. (2010). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Metode Extended Horizons Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Bissappu Kabupaten Bantaeng [online].Tersedia http://sangpenjelajahbulukumba.blogspot.com/2011/10/peningkatan-hasil-belajar-matematika.html [ 23 Desember 2012].

Jensen, E. (2008). Pembelajaran Berbasis Kemampuan Otak: Cara Baru Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pelatihan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Karso, dkk. (1993). Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan MIPA. Jakarta:Universitas Terbuka.

Nasution. (2004). Proses Belajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurhadyani, D. (2011). Artikel : Penerapan Brain Based Learning dalam pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa [online].Tersedia : Http://dinidinidini.wordpress.com [ 24 Desember 2012 ].

Rahadi, M. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Diktat perkuliahan STKIP Garut: tidak diterbitkan

Rahadi, M. (2010). Evaluasi Proses Hasil Pembelajaran Matematika (PHPM). STKIP – Garut: Tidak diterbitkan.

Ruseffendi. (1991). Pengantar Kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya Dalam Pengajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.

Rusyan, T. (2006). Kunci Sukses Belajar (Edisi I). Bandung: Sinergi Pustaka Indonesia.

Sahara, D. 2006. Meningkatkan prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII1 SMP Negeri 1 Batuatas pada pokok bahasan sistem persamaan linear dua peubah melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. [online]. Tersedia http://pendidikanmatematika.files.wordpress.com. [12 januari 2013].

Sugiyono. (2011). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sundayana, R. (2010). Panduan Praktikum Komputasi Data Statistika. Diktat perkuliahan STKIP Garut: tidak diterbitkan.

Syafa’at, A. (2011). Brain Based Learning [online]. Tersedia : http://sahabatguru.wordpress.com [ 26 Desember 2012].

Syafa’at, A. (2011).Brain based Learning. [online].Tersedia : Http ://matematika.upi.edu/index.php/brain-based-learning [ 24 Desember 2012].

Syah, M. (1995). Psikologi Pendidikan Suatu Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tilawati, F. (2012). Perbandingan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara yang mendapatkan model pembelajaran Brain based Learning dengan konvensional. Skripsi pada Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika. STKIP Garut: tidak diterbitkan.

Published

2013-01-30

How to Cite

Winarti, W., & Haq, C. N. (2013). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Antara Yang Mendapatkan Model Pembelajaran Brain Based Learning Dengan Numbered Head Together : Studi Eksperimen di SMP Negeri 1 Cikajang Kelas VII Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v2i1.271

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.