Additive vs Multiplikatif Thinking: An Exploration of Middle School Students’ Proportional Reasoning Ability in Rural Indonesian Context

Authors

  • Filian Yunita Sari STKIP Muhammadiyah OKU Timur
  • Zulkardi Zulkardi Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Ratu Ilma Indra Putri Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Ely Susanti Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i4.3538

Keywords:

ratio, proportion, mathematics ability, proportional reasoning, Belitang, kemampuan matematika, penalaran proporsional, proporsi, rasio

Abstract

Kemampuan penalaran proporsional sangat penting untuk memahami berbagai materi matematika dan menjadi tujuan utama di kurikulum sekolah dasar dan menengah. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui kemampuan siswa SMP dalam bernalar proporsional dalam konteks pedesaan Indonesia. Penelitian kualitatif ini dilakukan pada 33 siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Belitang dengan menggunakan tes uraian rasio dan proporsi yang mencakup seluruh indikator penalaran proporsional. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan siswa dalam bernalar proporsional masih rendah, ditandai dengan tingkat kesalahan menjawab soal lebih dari 87%. Sebagian besar kesalahan terjadi karena siswa menggunakan strategi aditif, bukan strategi multiplikatif yang benar. Temuan ini menunjukkan perlunya peningkatan pembelajaran matematika yang mendukung pengembangan penalaran proporsional, misalnya dengan mengintegrasikan konteks nyata dan aktivitas yang mendorong siswa memahami hubungan multiplikatif secara lebih mendalam.

Proportional reasoning is essential for understanding various mathematical topics and is a key goal in primary and secondary school curricula. Aims of this research is to identify middle school students' proportional reasoning in rural Indonesia context. This qualitative research was conducted with 33 seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Belitang using a descriptive test on ratio and proportion that covered all indicators of proportional reasoning. The results show that students’ proportional reasoning abilities are still low, with error rates exceeding 87%. Most errors occurred because students used additive strategies instead of the appropriate multiplicative strategies. These findings indicate the need to strengthen mathematics instruction to support the development of proportional reasoning, such as integrating realistic contexts and learning activities that help students better understand multiplicative relationships.

References

Adha, I., & Putri, R. I. I. (2024). A Learning Trajectory for Surface Area Concept with the Context of the Tourist Destination Bukit Sulap. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(3), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.23107/jpm.v18i3.pp409-430

Adha, I., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2024). When designer meets local culture: The promising learning trajectory on the surface area of polyhedron. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp945-960

Ahmad, L., Basir, M. A., & Kusmaryono, I. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes penalaran proporsional materi perbandingan berdasarkan taksonomi anderson. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sultan Agung 2, 2(Sendiksa 2), 169–176.

Arican, M. (2018). Preservice Mathematics Teachers ’ Understanding of and Abilities to Differentiate Proportional Relationships from Nonproportional Relationships. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9931-x

Arican, M. (2019). A diagnostic assessment to middle school students’ proportional reasoning. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(4), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.522839

Astuti, H. D., Upu, H., & Bustang. (2022). Analysis of Students ’ Abilities in Proportional Reasoning in Solving Mathematics Problems. ICSAT International Proceeding, 11(1), 138–145.

Carney, M. B., & Hughes, G. (2015). Analysis of Students ’ Proportional Reasoning Strategies. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Chaim, B. D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B.-S. (2012). Ratio and Proportion Research and Teaching in Mathematics Teachers’ Education (Pre- and In-Service Mathematics Teachers of Elementary and Middle School Classes). In Springer eBooks: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-784-4

Fadilla, D. M. N., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2022). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Sistematis dan Intuitif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Numerasi. MATHEdunesa, 11(3), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n3.p630-643

Frith, V., & Lloyd, P. (2016). Proportional reasoning ability of school leavers aspiring to higher education in South Africa. Pythagoras Journal of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v37i1.317

Gea, M. M., Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., & Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2023). Relating students’ proportional reasoning level and their understanding of fair games. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682

Hudiria, I., Haji, S., & Zamzaili, Z. (2022). Mathematical Disposition dan Self-concept terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Mahasiswa pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 435–446.

Izzatin, M. (2020). Proportional Reasoning in Mathematics: What and How is the Process? Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Education and Pedagogy (ICIEP 2020), 619(ICIEP 2020), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211219.022

Khotimi, A. Z., Prabawanto, S., & Jupri, A. (2024). How High School Students Solve Proportional Reasoning Problem ? Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 11(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v11i1.36458

Lamon, S. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research (In K. Lest). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Information Age Publishing.

Lamon, S. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (Lamon, S.).

Langrall, C. W., & Swafford, J. (2000). Three Balloons For Two Dollars: Developing Proportional Reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 254–261.

Maulandani, S., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2024). Mathematical Reasoning Skills Review of Student Self-Regulated Learning in Number Pattern. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i1.1685

Muttaqin, H., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2017). Design research on ratio and proportion learning by using ratio table and graph with OKU Timur context at the 7 th grade. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.3969.211-222

Nugraha, Y., Sujadi, I., & Pangadi, P. (2016). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas VII. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v9i1.2

Nur, I. M., & Sari, D. P. (2022). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Missing Value dan Comparison Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Sistematis. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(November), 467–482.

Prayitno, A., Rossa, A., & Widayanti, F. D. (2019). Level penalaran proporsional siswa dalam memecahkan missing value problem. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.19728

Puspita, T., Muzdalipah, I., & Nurhayati, E. (2023). Kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional pada Materi Perbandingan. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i1.2429

Putra, A., Tensa, Y., & Erita, S. (2020). Analisis Penalaran Proporsional Siswa dengan Gaya Belajar Auditori dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Perbandingan. Journal on Education, 2(4), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v2i4.326

Sari, F. Y., Ilma, R., Putri, I., & Susanti, E. (2025a). How do junior high school students solve proportional reasoning problems ? Jurnal Elemen, 11(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i2.27922

Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025d). Integrating google earth into scale learning : A learning trajectory through rice field size exploration. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v15i2.44693

Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Susanti, E., & Nusantara, D. S. (2024). Ratio material learning design using the context of cooking rice to help elementary students understand concepts. Inomatika, 6(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v6i1.443

Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025c). Learning trajectory of rate material using the context of plowing rice fields. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v5i1.2509

Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025b). Ratios in agriculture : A rice fertilization context for ratio learning trajectory. Mathematics Education Journal, 19(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v19i3.pp509-526

Sari, Y. M., Fiangga, S., El Milla, Y. I., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2023). Exploring students’ proportional reasoning in solving guided-unguided area conservation problem: A case of Indonesian students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.V14I2.PP375-394

Şen, C., Sonay AY, Z., & Güler, G. (2021). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-based Learning on Middle School Students’ Mathematics Reasoning Skill. Athens Journal Of Education, 8(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.8-4-5

Setyaningsih, N., Juniati, D., & Suwarsono. (2018). Student ’ s scheme in solving mathematics problems. International Conference on Mathematics: Pure, Applied and Computation. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/974/1/012012

Taufik, A. (2021). Kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional Matematis Siswa Dengan Gaya Belajar Field Independent. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika (JES-MAT), 7(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v7i2.4213

Tunç, M. P. (2020). Investigation of Middle School Students’ Solution Strategies in Solving Proportional and Non-proportional Problems. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16949/TURKBILMAT.560349

Tunç, M. P., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2020). Fostering prospective mathematics teachers ’ proportional reasoning through a practice-based instruction. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1844909

Utari, R. S., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2015). Supporting 7 Th Students ’ Proportional Reasoning Using Palembang Culture as Context and Ratio Table as Model. The Third South East Asia Design/Development Research International Conference, 344–352.

Wahyuni, I. (2022). Penalaran Proporsional. Lembaga Ladang Kata.

Widayanti, M., Jumiah, Y., & Ijuddin, R. (2020). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa SMP Negeri 18 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 9(10), 1–9.

Yuliani, R., & Alfin, E. (2021). Analisis kemampuan penalaran proporsional siswa. Jurnal Bayesian, 1(1), 24–39.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025). Additive vs Multiplikatif Thinking: An Exploration of Middle School Students’ Proportional Reasoning Ability in Rural Indonesian Context. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(4), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i4.3538

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.